>>2133690
What you think is irrelevant legally. I know you think you're a Q operative, but what you said is not what Doom said, which is what matters.
ere is Doom indicating that Strzok didn't have bias against Trump or for Hillary.
See, after the Gaetz questioning, this is what I'm trying to tell you faggots. The coverup is that he texted biased shit but he was such an honorable FBI agent that he still honorably went about his work.
That this agrees with Horowitz's report is alarming because that report will be key evidence.
Political bias isn't a crime. Falsifying and manipulating investigations is a crime, which I suppose is the procedural crime you're talking about. These texts should be evidence that the investigations were manipulated, but Doom's report said that is not what happened. Doom said the investigators arrived at their decisions free from bias. A reasonable person would disagree, but the court will not care. Joe Blow's opinion is not admissible as evidence, but Horowitz's report is admissible. The jury only reaches a verdict on the evidence heard.
RICO can only be used if a pattern of criminal activity has been established within an organization and the person prosecuted under RICO was a member of that organization.
What he just read is not what Horowitz testified