Anonymous ID: 302f63 Aug. 2, 2024, 7:33 a.m. No.21338712   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8760 >>8885

I see some of you are still allowing the shills to earn a paycheck by replying to them. Stop feeding them, this includes the Q2 poster. You can tell the newfag/shills because they don't realize you are supposed to leave the name blank when you post. If you don't have the self discipline to ignore them, then by all means use the filter.

Anonymous ID: 302f63 Aug. 2, 2024, 8:16 a.m. No.21338954   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21338931

Looked at yesterday, should have made the notables, it was denied, then appealed and denied again. As I understood the dig from yesterday, Brunson is done/over, US Supreme court wiped their ass with it and moved on.

Anonymous ID: 302f63 Aug. 2, 2024, 8:33 a.m. No.21339041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9066 >>9096 >>9200

>>21339022

I was in yesterdays digs, they pulled the chronological for that case and it was shot down, then appealed and shot down again. There was a discussion that it noted in the denial that the three liberal justices weren't involved in the decision (recused). It should have made the notables unless that baker was missed it or was comp'd.