Kamala's repeated "word salads" is not just a result of her incompetence or significant room for opportunity in improving cognition, but it is because of her chosen philosophical worldview that has a very high dependency on the circular logic inherent in the Marxist / Young Hegelian schema.

Marxism is at root a projection of an alienated psychology (infinitely aggrandizing spiritual god complex crashing against mortal corporeal finite body) manifesting in sets of opposites, of contradictions, spewed into the world as observations of the natural order and of people, and justified by self-referencing the same set of opposites and contradictions as legitimized by those outputs having occurred in history.

"Negating the negation of the negation of the negation of the negation…."

So you get

"the importance of community banks, as they are called, is that they are in the community, lead by members of the community, by people who understand the capacity of the community, the needs of the community"

you get

"the significance of the passage of time, so when you think about it there is great significance to the passage of time"

you get circular references on and on because at root that is all Marxist logic can "offer" in the construction of ideas and sentences.

This is also why the "final" outputted ideas and sentences from the radical left always have to have unnecessary what they often refer to as "complex" ideas added to the mix, in other words a flotsam and jetsam series of disconnected assertions with unjustified jumps in logic, a garbled collection of statements that are not sequential selective and iterative, nor following a clear deduction in the steps, but a hodge podge of circular logic isolated statements jumbled together, and presented in such a way that if anyone doesn't understand the deductions, then they are accused of being unable to grasp the "complexity" and "nuanced" shape of the sloppily constructed word salads, and you just have to trust and obey and if not then you're smeared as a reactionary, retrogressive, oppressive, part of the system, etc.

Would it be discriminatory, aggressive and transphobic to stop anon (who identifies as defender of women from male aggressors) from being included in punching those two male boxers for repeatedly hitting those women at the Olympics?

It would be an exclusionary and divisive discrimination of anon's right to implement anon's self-identity.

If it isn't exclusionary or discriminatory, why isn't it? Is it because the male boxers don't consent?

But the women boxers never gave their consent either to be hit by men. The IOC made that decision for the women. The IOC decided that the women shall be repeatedly hit by men, because otherwise it would be exclusionary and discriminatory to the men from their perspective, which appears to be the only one that matters to the IOC.

So doesn't it stand to reason then by the IOC's own logic, indeed by the entire "woke" logic that puts the "self-identifying ego" as absolute, that ANYONE who self-identifies as defenders of women against being repeatedly hit by men, should be included, and should be welcome as bringing more diversity, and should be able to implement punching those two male boxers until they're unconscious? After all, the IOC logic says that anon's ego is supreme, that we don't need to get the permission from or ask the two male boxers, the sole and exclusive point is anon's self-identifying ego that must not be excluded from implementing anon's self-identity.

>>21340456

>How can I tell I am a racist and a clown dick sucker?

Q+ shooter appears in Blockrock commercial.

Now this.

"Weird" isn't it.

Q+: ""maybe we'll pay off our $35 trillion debt by handing them a little crypto check, handing them a little Bitcoin."

Mayor Adams' attempt to stop buses of migrants from arriving in NYC rejected by State Supreme Court

Remember kids, the mayor demanded this happen before he tried to help the Democrats win 2024 election by seeking to suddenly stop it.

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/nyc-charter-bus-lawsuit-rejected-asylum-seeker-crisis/

>>21340587

HEY ROTHSCHILDS, HERE'S A CRYPTO CHECK TO SETTLE THE $35 TRILLION IN DEBT

KMAO!

>>21340630

Is that when a tiny group (relative to world pop) of radical extreme Muslims and radical extreme Jews each claim that they are by "bloodline" the true heirs and owners of the holy land?