>>21338872, >>21339022, >>21339040, >>21339041 Brunson Case still on the SCOTUS website as active?PN

Here is the record of what I understand that happened with the Brunson cases.

Follow the screenshots and the links, to confirm for yourself.

The Brunson Brothers had submitted three different cases to the SC regarding the 2020 Election, in 2022 and 2023. When denied, they have appealed each time to get the court to reconsider, each one has been denied. They have been denied in Conference, meaning that didn’t even consider taking the case, 2-3 times,so the Brunson’s are either extremely lucky, or imo Blessed by God.(They will never give up, nor should they)

On the docket: The way you know what is the latest is whatever show up at the top of the search and the number it starts with, obviously any starting with “23” was submitted in 2023, anything that has “22” was submitted and either approved or denied in 2022.

Not all cases with the name Brunson, are the Brunson Brothers, as you can see below Deron, Raland and Loy are the brothers.

CORRECT LINK BELOW TO FIND WHAT IS ON THE DOCKET, BETTER TO HAVE FIRST AND LAST NAME, below search was only last name, brought up 11 pages of docs, with only 5 total combined Deron, Raland and Loy.

DOCKET LINK:https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx

General search Screenshot #1

Brunson brothers search Screenshot #2

Final Determination of the 2023 Case decided on July 22, 2024

Posting the screenshotI posted yesterday.ANONS THIS CASE IS DEAD, there are no other cases submitted or showing up on the docket. Case: 23-1073

This link will bring you to the outcome of the latest denial, see the latest denial on July 22, 2024.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-1073.html

screenshot #3

Below is the 2024 Docket, there are over 100 pages of cases, there are none with the Brunson brothers in 2024. But if they did submit for 2024 another caseit may be added to the Shadow Docket, it’s not showing up on this link, because I typed in Brunson 2024 and only 2022 and 2023 cases came up. So at this point we won’t know what’s on the shadow docket for 2024, like we didn’t know about the shadow docket until July of 2024.:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx

screenshot #4

I hope this helps.

>>21340339

No it's not active, they denied it twice, first on the case, second on the request for rehearing

>>21340352

Kyle has to get his head on straight…and still away from radicals. And he's going to have to beg for forgiveness. Anyone that talks bad about Trump now, will need to rethink their strategy

>>21340348

sure we are going to believe you Jim, you'll a tool for the oligarchs

>>21340111

>https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1819093345131450723

Chairman Jordan Demands Documents About Potential Bias in Trump Trial Judge

August 1, 20241/2

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House

Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) sent a letter to Loren Merchan, President of Authentic Campaigns Inc. and a former Kamala Harris campaign staffer, requesting documents and communications between Authentic Campaigns, the Biden-Harris campaign, and the Democrat National Committee related to the prosecution of President Donald Trump. Loren Merchan’s father, Judge Juan Merchan, presided over the trial and refused to recuse himself despite the apparent conflict of interest.

Experts have raised substantial concerns with Judge Merchan refusing to recuse himself from President Trump's case despite his daughter's work on behalf of President Trump's political adversariesand the financial benefit that Loren Merchan's firm, Authentic Campaigns Inc., could receive from the prosecution and conviction.

Excerpts of the Letter to Loren Merchan:

"Since 2019, you have been closely involved in presidential campaigns for both President Biden and Vice President Harris. In 2019, you served as the director of digital persuasion for then-presidential candidate Harris's campaign while simultaneously serving as Vice President at Authentic Campaigns, a 'Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm.' During your time working on behalf ofVice President Harris, Authentic Campaigns received over $7 million in compensationfor its services. According toyour now-deleted LinkedIn, after Vice President Harris dropped out of the Democrat primary, you were promoted to President of Authentic Campaigns.

"Campaigns then conducted work for the 2020 Biden-Harris campaign, which included 'digital paid media, design and development, social media, mobile messaging, [and] artificial intelligence.' According to Authentic Campaigns' website, Authentic Campaigns sought to '[h]arness the potential of conversation AI for presidential campaign marketing to connect the Biden campaign with undecided voters in crucial swing states, particularly those unreachable through traditional means due to COVID-19 restrictions.' According to public records, theBiden-Harris campaign paid Authentic Campaigns just over $2 million in a one monthperiod for its work.

"On April 4, 2023, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicted President Trumpwith 34 counts of falsifying business records.Since the indictments, two of Authentic Campaigns' top clients—RepresentativeAdam Schiffand the Senate Majority PAC—haveraised 'at least $93 million in campaign donations' while referencing the indictments in their solicitation emails. Notably, according to one report, RepresentativeSchiff's campaignfor U.S. Senate has received'$20 million in aid sincehe began soliciting donationsoff the presumptive GOP presidential front-runner’s unprecedented 34-count indictment last April.' TheSenate Majority PAC similarly has 'pocketed $73.6 millionsince it also began firing offfundraising emails following the ex-president’s indictment.' At a minimum, there is a perception that you andAuthentic Campaigns could profit considerably from President Trump's prosecution in a forum overseen by your father.

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/chairman-jordan-demands-documents-about-potential-bias-trump-trial-judge

>>21340655

2/2

"In testimony to the Committee, experts have explainedhow Judge Merchan made several errors before and during President Trump's trial that violated due process, infringed upon his First Amendment rights, and prevented him from receiving a fair trial.

Among other fundamental errors, Judge Merchan admitted into evidence plainly inadmissible, irrelevant, and prejudicial testimony against President Trump, while limiting President Trump's ability to rebut it.

Judge Merchan issued a gag order to prohibit President Trumpfrom making statements about the judge's family members, including you and your political advocacy work on behalf of Democrats. JudgeMerchan refused to recuse himself, despite his close ties to Democrat aligned interestsand the likelihood that your political advocacy firm could benefit financially from his rulings. JudgeMerchan's bias was so obviousthat oneformer federal prosecutor, a left-wing legal analyst, disagreedforcefully with Judge Merchan's decision not to recuse, stating thathe 'absolutely should have recused himself[.]'

"Judge Merchan's conflicts of interest and biasesin the case against President Trump, the Republican nominee in the upcoming 2024 presidential election,implicate serious federal interests. Congress has a specific and manifestly important interest in preventing politically motivated prosecutions of current and former presidents,especially in venues in which real or perceived biases exist.

The House is currently considering legislation, informed by the Committee's oversight, that would remedy politically motivated local prosecutionsby allowing a current or former president to remove the case to a more neutral forum in federal court. If such a measure were in place at the time, Judge Merchan would not have presided over President Trump's trial."

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/chairman-jordan-demands-documents-about-potential-bias-trump-trial-judge

>>21340667

Congress and Jordan are not fucking around, she has 7 days to submit this info, which is unheard of:

As we continue our oversight of politically motivated prosecutions by state and local officials, we believe that you may possess records relevant to our work, particularly whether the House should move forward with the removal legislation discussed above. We ask, therefore, that you provide the following documents and information:

1. All contracts and invoices referring or relating to work performed by Authentic Campaigns for or on behalf of the Biden for President campaign, the Harris for President campaign, or the Democratic National Committee for the period January 1, 2023, to the present;

1. All documents and communications between or among Authentic Campaigns or any of its employees, agents, or representatives, the Biden for President campaign, or the Harris for President campaign referring or relating to the indictment, prosecution, or conviction of President Donald J. Trump for the period April 1, 2023, to the present;

1. All documents and communications referring or relating to any work performed by Authentic Campaigns that refers to the indictment, prosecution, or conviction of President Donald J. Trump for the period April 1, 2023, to the present.

1. All documents and communications between or amongAuthentic Campaigns or any of its employees, agents, or representatives and Judge Juan Merchan or any of his employees or representatives referring or relating to the indictment, prosecution, or conviction of President Donald J. Trump for the period April 1, 2023, to the present.

Please provide the information requested as soon as possible but no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 8, 2024. The Supreme Court has recognized that Congress has a “broad and indispensable” power to conduct oversight, which “encompasses inquiries into the administration of existing laws, studies of proposed laws, and surveys in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling Congress to remedy them.”19 Pursuant to the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee has jurisdiction over criminal justice matters in the United States.20

>>21340719

They want all the documents since April 1, 2023, on April 4, 2023 Bragg indicted Trump.

Rich Barris with Navarro: President Trump's 52% Approval Rating Arose From No New Wars, Prosperity, And Peace Under Trump

8:50

https://rumble.com/embed/v573wms/?pub=4