dChan
ID: 4f9eba Aug. 5, 2024, 1:41 p.m. No.21357262   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7285 >>7374 >>7518 >>7720 >>7809 >>7850

>>21357144

 

So there is no right to hear as per say in the Constitution but they do have a right to hear free speech according to the 4th Amendment without a doubt:

 

Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

So it isNotable"The right of the people to be secure in their effects against seizures" and they are seizing their right to information, regardless whether it is correct or not; it is information.

ID: 4f9eba Aug. 5, 2024, 1:45 p.m. No.21357285   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7374 >>7518 >>7720 >>7809 >>7850

>>21357262

 

They have the right to pursue anything that makes them "secure in their persons". Getting information from candidates that are going to be the CiC and POTUS gives them that security; especially when you consider many of them will serve in the military under such leadership.

ID: 4f9eba Aug. 5, 2024, 1:49 p.m. No.21357322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7350 >>7518 >>7580 >>7720 >>7809 >>7850

>>21357144

 

So not only are gags orders abridging or cutting off free speech which violates the 1st Amendment but the violate the 4th Amendment for those that want to be secure in their persons and effects by hearing from a candidate who will be POTUS and Commander in Chief.

 

Take this angle, you will not lose. What you put forth was vague and was left up to interpretation of hearing is not free speech. I am always right, always.

ID: 4f9eba Aug. 5, 2024, 2:03 p.m. No.21357420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7431

>>21357374

 

Do you understand the game that the Supreme Court played? The 1st is about free speech not free listening, technically. The courts are obligated to do path searching nor tell the lawyers what they should be pursuing unless the lawyers ask the court to specifically explain which most lawyers just never seem to do. But to be "Secure in your persons and effects" from the 4th would cover listening or hearing because that information makes them secure have it, especially for those that have family serving in the Military to be informed of their Commander in Chief.