>>21357144

Let me say this once again because it is important. A judge may know right from wrong, even that you are suing but using the wrong law as your defense or argument; they are not obligated nor part of their job to tell you this, correct you, nor point you in the right direction. They will just decide: do you have a valid case or not; and if not dismissed. But you "Can" ask a judge to explain the law and they must explain the law to anyone in the court , lawyers, DAs, defendants, prosecutors, plaintiffs, and jurors So the lawyers could have asked why they are not covered by the first and then ask what Amendment would cover their people to hear President Trump and the judge or judges "must" tell them. And that should be done before you let them make a decision.

>>21357475

>Buffett sold off $277 billion yesterday… looks like he knew something.. hmmm…

I bet you that they all did because they are trying to tank the economy. The Elite all at once pull out their money and then lock the trading systems down so the little guy can't abandon ship. After everything crumbles they will start trading again, watch everyone panic and sell low, and then they will buy back at a fire sale. See how this works? I am always right, always.

>>21357533

Tell Jim to ask Elon, Tucker, or Trump, they are all billionaires.

>>21357322

>>21357322 (You) what is the headline for this?

2 things:

gag orders abridge, means cut off, free speech, violates 1st Amendment

Hearing information is covered under 4th Amendment, the right to be secure in your persons & effects, when deciding on a CiC.

>>21357486

This should beNotabletoo.

A judge is not privileged to tell you what is the right application of law but a judge must explain the law to everyone in the court room. Ask the right questions.

>>21357580

>>21357637

So, Missouri sued under the wrong law, free speech when they should have sued under the 4th Amendment right to be secure in their persons and effects regarding a candidate for CiC and POTUS.

PDJT needs to sue on abridging, which means cut off, the right to free speech of the 1st Amendment and that the Constitution is the Supreme Law and immutable to all States and Judges otherwise.

In addition Trump can sue over the 6th Amendment too, because he has the right to a public "hearing" and can be heard in public, as public as he wants it to be. And the 6th Amendment allows him to call witnesses on his behalf, which also includes himself as a witness.

Are we CLEAR?

>>21357690

Why are you such a little imbecile? I told you yesterday, the white hats control whether my posts have that information or not, and they IP hop for me too. I had posts in the past that no matter what I did the name would always come out as "good" and I couldn't clear it no matter what I did, but it didn't post that way. Do you understand what I just told you?