Anonymous ID: 685a00 July 12, 2018, 6:49 p.m. No.2136467   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6486 >>6491 >>6621 >>6629 >>6685 >>6692 >>6720 >>6803

Ok, I've been stewing on this practically all day. Strzok testified today. A lot of us saw all or part of it. I saw a contentious, smug son-of-a-bitch in Strzok, flippantly dodging questions (and don't get me started on the Demonrats). I really wanted Strzok frog marched to prison now!

 

But then I remembered a Q post. #1288 on qanon.pub for reference:

 

>Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed].

 

That got me thinking: If he's a cooperating witness, why is he ducking, dodging, and acting like a pretentious asshole?

 

Took me a while, but then I remembered another thing Q said on June 11:

 

>You are watching a 'scripted' movie.

 

At the time it was referring to the meeting with Rocketman in Singapore. But what if the reference isn't just for that instance.

 

Here's my theory:

 

  1. If Strzok is a cooperating witness, why act so pretentious? Well, what does every good movie have? A good villain, perhaps?

 

  1. We've been talking so much about the Deep State, but it's always been basically an abstract bad guy. There isn't a face to the Deep State. It's like "The Nothing" in Neverending Story (yes, oldfag here. I'm dating myself, I know). Because it's so nebulous, it's hard to get normies to visualize it.

 

  1. Now, think about movies/shows with notable villains. The Joker in "The Dark Knight." Cercei Lannister in "Game of Thrones." Belloc in the first Indiana Jones movie. Normies can identify those baddies. They know them by just a picture, and the know that what they represent is evil. In the case of Cercei and Belloc, their smug, contentious attitude makes them even more hated and despised.

 

See where I'm going with this?

 

If what Q is telling us is true (and I don't doubt it is), what if Strzok is supposed to be the poster child for the Deep State? Think of his performance today and ask yourself why would he, let alone his counsels, allow him to:

 

  • Be combative with Congress?

  • Sneer?

  • Lower his head to look menacing?

  • Refuse to answer basic questions, like how many interviews he conducted before a certain date?

 

This does not present a positive image. Which may be what Q and the team is doing. What if part of Strzok's cooperation is to play the part of the villain? To be the face of the Deep State (in the beginning) to get normies to see how corrupt these people, and to get fags like us a rallying cry to try and redpill normies?

 

TL:DR - We're watching a movie. Strzok's taking on the role of villain to put a face to the Deep State for normies to identify with. His performance is Oscar worthy, and will help fuel many a redpill.