>>21361245

>>21361267

"Liddle' George"

KaNambla

TT21290

[Profile picture from source site (X Post/Truth Social)] Donald J. Trump / @realDonaldTrump 08/06/2024 00:22:17

ID: Not Available

Truth Social: 112913163072830118

I watched three weeks ago as George Slopadopolus interviewed Crooked Joe Biden, doing everything possible to keep him in the race after his terrible Presidential Debate performance.Liddle’ George, of ABC FAKE NEWS, was so solicitous and nice, asking easy questions and doing whatever was necessary to make Sleepy, the WORST President in the history of our Country (Kamablais the WORST V.P.), look alert and sharp. It didn’t work, but he tried! Then I watched Slopadopolus viciously attack Congressman Byron Donalds, a future star in the Republican Party, with nasty and totally inappropriate questions, the exact opposite of the treatment given to Crooked Joe. The good news is that Byron swatted him away like a fly, not to be heard from again!

1822

Q !A6yxsPKia.08/06/2018 19:31:41 ID:

8chan/patriotsfight: 121

Psychological Projection.

Define Conspiracy.

1. a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.

"a conspiracy to destroy the government"

1. the action of plotting or conspiring.

"they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"

[Fake News]

Fake News collaborating and pushing knowingly false information?

Fake News ‘KNOWINGLY FALSE’ narrative pushes.

1. POTUS colluded w/ Russia to win the 2016 Presidential election

2. POTUS is puppet to PUTIN

3. POTUS to irreparably harm relationships w/ our allies

4. POTUS will collapse U.S. economy

5. POTUS will collapse stock market

6. POTUS will cause war w/ NK

7. POTUS will cause war w/ IRAN

8. POTUS will destroy the world.

9. On and on……..(knowingly false)

FEAR & SCARE PUSH.

They would rather see NK peace negotiations fail (WAR!) than see POTUS resolve.

Scandalous Media Bias?

Conspiracy?

Collaboration?

What are they hiding?

FAKE NEWS MEDIA IS NOT FREE AND INDEPENDENT.

FAKE NEWS MEDIA = PROPAGANDA ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Think WL list of journalists who colluded w/ HRC/DNC (2016 Pres election).

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED by RACE.

DIVIDED by RELIGION.

DIVIDED by CULTURE.

DIVIDED by CLASS.

DIVIDED by POLITICAL AFFILIATION.

DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.

TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.

YOU, THE PEOPLE, HAVE THE POWER.

This movement challenges their ‘forced’ narrative.

This movement challenges people to not simply trust what is being reported.

Research for yourself.

Think for yourself.

Trust yourself.

This movement is not about one person or a group of people.

WE, THE PEOPLE.

You are witnessing a FULL PANIC ATTACK by the FAKE NEWS MEDIA & COVERT ALT MEDIA AFFILIATES (foreign gov’t).

They cannot contain or defeat what they do not understand.

Is any of this normal?

Think sealed indictments count.

Think resignations of CEOs.

Think resignations of Senators.

Think resignations of Congress.

Think termination of sr FBI…

Think termination of sr DOJ…

WATERGATE X1000

Attacks will only intensify.

Logical thinking.

Ask yourself a simple question – WHY????

Q

>>21361245

>>21361461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.

ZHI GUO, et al.,

Plaintiff-Relators,

v.

==NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR

DEMOCRACY==, et al.,

Defendants

25

dissident community broke their connections with him. Id. ¶ 14. Thus, ICPC’s statements made

Guo unfit for his chosen profession—spreading and endorsing opposition against the Chinese

government. Because Guo’s allegations meet the required elements of a D.C. defamation claim,

the Court will enter liability against ICPC on Count VI for the two defamatory statements.

Which brings the Court to damages. Guo requests both general damages and special

damages. See Pls.’ Tort Mot. at 6. General damages compensate a plaintiff for intangible

injuries, such as his reputational harm. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 621 cmt. a (1977).

In contrast, special damages compensate losses of an “economic or pecuniary” nature. Id.

Because Guo has shown defamation per se, he does not have to prove general damages. See Dun

& Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749, 757 (1985).

Guo requests $300,000 in special damages. See Pls.’ Tort Mot. at 6. How he reaches that

figure is confusing. He says that his income decreased by $120,000 in the three years after ICPC

fired him in 2007. See id. He then posits that “assuming a conservative loss of income of

$30,000 per year for ten years” after the firing, “that would equate to $300,000.” Id.

The Court does not question Guo’s math, merely his rationale. For one thing, the

measure of damages does not begin when ICPC fired him, but when it defamed him. And

although he may state a defamation claim without alleging a time of defamation, seeKamabla,

280 F. Supp. 3d at 141, the Court cannot award appropriate damages without knowing when the

defamation occurred and for how long Guo felt its effects. The Complaint says that ICPC began

defaming him “[a]fter his expulsion,” but does not say when. Compl. ¶ 100. The Court thus

cannot assume, without more, that the defamation began in 2007 when ICPC fired him. And

even if it could, Guo offers only conclusory reasons for why the Court should compensate him

for ten years after that.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2018cv2986-33