Anon ID: e3c223 Jan. 31, 2018, 7:54 a.m. No.222684   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2735

>>222565

Lurker here. Looking at those flags it looks like there is an image in the red strips and possibly the white as well. Possible two separate images or perhaps two images that composite into one. Dunno. Also, perhaps inverting the image, like a negative and make a positive print.

 

Just some thoughts.

Anon ID: e3c223 Jan. 31, 2018, 7:28 p.m. No.229750   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9841 >>9930

>>229286

Did some research. Image is Independence hall right?

 

From wiki:

A convention held in Independence Hall in 1915, presided over by former US president William Howard Taft, marked the formal announcement of the formation of the League to Enforce Peace, which led to the League of Nations and eventually the United Nations. The building is part of Independence National Historical Park and is listed as a World Heritage Site.[3]

 

Is this part of it?

Anon ID: e3c223 Jan. 31, 2018, 7:33 p.m. No.229841   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>229750

Also,

Independence Hall is the building where both the United States Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution were debated and adopted.

 

Can't find anything about the time though. The image does have a pic of the declaration of independence though. Hmmm.

Anon ID: e3c223 Jan. 31, 2018, 7:54 p.m. No.230225   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>230221

This is interesting.

 

As documented by journalist Jonathan Kay, Luke Rudkowski interrupted a lecture by former Trilateral Commission director Zbigniew Brzezinski in April 2007 and accused the organization and a few others of having orchestrated the attacks of September 11 to initiate a new world order.[14]

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 2, 2018, 6:13 a.m. No.246286   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6482

>>227313

For some reason I keep wanting to associate this image with,

 

"The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall when the proceedings ended in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors. The answer was provided immediately. A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, "A republic, if you can keep it."

 

I can't find a time of day that it happened though, but that may not be relevant.

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 2, 2018, 6:43 a.m. No.246482   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6681 >>6730 >>6808 >>7040

>>246286

I also can't help but think, that this is somehow applicable.

 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. โ€” That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, โ€” That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. โ€” Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government."

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 2, 2018, 8:24 a.m. No.247219   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>247104

Yeah, now that you mention it, I do seem to recall something to that effect. Some people wanted to extend the sentiment to ALL men and actually considered all men equal, while others were less inclined to extend it to those they felt were, "inferior." Sad, but those were how things were in those days.

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 2, 2018, 9:33 p.m. No.254927   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5015 >>5246

>>254695

I've been rereading all the Q posts, and when I got to one of the images, the title got me thinking. Has anyone looked up the 13th Amendment?

 

"The 13th Amendment to the Constitution declared that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Formally abolishing slavery in the United States, the 13th Amendment was passed by the Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the states on December 6, 1865."

 

JANUARY 31st.

 

Interesting? Or was that already brought up?

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 2, 2018, 9:45 p.m. No.255015   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5050

>>254927

Also, both times that I've seen so far, when he uses the words spider web, it's always after he says watch the news.

 

What do spider webs do? They catch flies. A reference that the news is like the spider coaxing the fly to come in and get trapped?

 

Hmm, Future unlocks past.

Watch the news.

Spider web.

Stop taking the sleeping pill.

 

The media is probably the sleeping pill to lull us back to sleep if we actually believe their lies. Its a web designed to entangle us in and make struggle harder?

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 3, 2018, 6:53 a.m. No.257074   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0299

>>253845

I have a question. How many images has Q posted? I am kind of a late comer in here. I've seen some of them, but has anyone put them all together in order of posting? I would like to see that, I'm kind of visually oriented.

 

The reason I ask is because I am wondering if there is a kind of time line here. The image you have here is of Washington crossing the Delaware. What is the history of that and how would it apply to our current situation?

 

Did some reading.

 

"During the American Revolution, Patriot General George Washington crosses the Delaware River with 5,400 troops, hoping to surprise a Hessian force celebrating Christmas at their winter quarters in Trenton, New Jersey. The unconventional attack came after several months of substantial defeats for Washingtonโ€™s army that had resulted in the loss of New York City and other strategic points in the region.

 

At about 11 p.m. on Christmas, Washingtonโ€™s army commenced its crossing of the half-frozen river at three locations. The 2,400 soldiers led by Washington successfully braved the icy and freezing river and reached the New Jersey side of the Delaware just before dawn. The other two divisions, made up of some 3,000 men and crucial artillery, failed to reach the meeting point at the appointed time.

 

At approximately 8 a.m. on the morning of December 26, Washingtonโ€™s remaining force, separated into two columns, reached the outskirts of Trenton and descended on the unsuspecting Hessians. Trentonโ€™s 1,400 Hessian defenders were groggy from the previous eveningโ€™s festivities and underestimated the Patriot threat after months of decisive British victories throughout New York. Washingtonโ€™s men quickly overwhelmed the Germansโ€™ defenses, and by 9:30 a.m. the town was surrounded. Although several hundred Hessians escaped, nearly 1,000 were captured at the cost of only four American lives. However, because most of Washingtonโ€™s army had failed to cross the Delaware, he was without adequate artillery or men and was forced to withdraw from the town.

 

The victory was not particularly significant from a strategic point of view, but news of Washingtonโ€™s initiative raised the spirits of the American colonists, who previously feared that the Continental Army was incapable of victory."

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 4, 2018, 8:24 a.m. No.265912   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5949

>>261805

That image kinda looks like a chalice and a blade to me. So I searched and found this.

 

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chalice_and_the_Blade

 

The author, Riane Eisler among other things, is a member of the club of Rome.

Anon ID: e3c223 Feb. 4, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.271212   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Hey guys, watching the movie, "National Treasure." Might be worth watching. There seem to be some parallels with the crypto stuff here, and the overall Q experience.

 

Sometimes its best to just sit back and relax and let your mind wander and look for things that cause the light to go on.

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 5, 2018, 7:32 a.m. No.274547   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5132 >>6020

>>273354

Not sure if it means anything, but the flag with the gold fringe is an admiralty flag. During those days, there were sort of two jurisdictions of law, the law of the land, i.e. common law, and admiralty law, or maritime law, or contract law.

 

Ever remember reading any documents from that time where a man would say, "I am a man of the land?" Or, "โ€ฆbeing a man of the land?"

 

They are announcing which jurisdiction they fall into. Being a man of the land means they fall under common law which requires an actual victim, whereas in maritime law, the "state," is the victim.

Anon ID: e3c223 Feb. 5, 2018, 12:05 p.m. No.277185   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1143

>>276932

What you have looks interesting, see if this helps in any way.

 

http:// cryptiana.web.fc2.com/code/franklin.htm

 

Thing is, you would have to know which document was being used. I suspect in this case it is the constitution or the declaration of independence.

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 5, 2018, 2:55 p.m. No.278837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8908

>>278770

I've been thinking about this one, but it creates more questions, at least to me. The best way to get answers, is to ask the right questions.

 

Why did the #Memo drop a Friday [& before the SB]?

Did this seem strange to you?

 

Just take those two lines, they seem connected. Several questions come to my mind. WHAT in the memo would have an effect of any kind. Or, is the memo itself sufficient?

 

WHAT about the memo would make a difference one way or the other in regards to WHEN it was released in conjunction with the SB?

 

The only thing I can come up with is the NARRATIVE. It seems like it might have something to do with controlling the narrative in order to counter the msm lies.

 

This seems to be about waking people up. They MUST see it with their own eyes.

 

The media is trying to put everyone back to sleep, to divert from the REAL issue at hand, which is we are surrounded by corruption.

 

Dunno, just my thoughts. There is an overall picture here.

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 5, 2018, 3:04 p.m. No.278908   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8959

>>278837

Further thoughts. Q is right when he says, "Freedom of the Press is VITAL to retain."

 

When you take over a country, other than military targets, one of the first things you seize and gain control over is the media. Radio stations, tv stations etc. Why?

 

When you control what the people hear, you control the people. Same thing with information in general.

Anonymous ID: e3c223 Feb. 5, 2018, 3:12 p.m. No.278959   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8967

>>278908

The bad actors are being flushed out for all to see. In fact they are outing themselves so fast it's hard to keep up. That is for the normies to see in my opinion.

 

They are screwed because we have the goods on them and they have two choices. Do nothing and hope for the best, or fight back which exposes them.

 

Either way, they lose.