she's not black, she's indian. Thus BIZARRE.
would you like to tell us what the chemical is? KEK
con't:
…The weed-killing chemical, known as DCPA or Dacthal, can harm the developing brains of babies in the womb, and can remain in farm fields for weeks, EPA officials said. The greatest threat is to pregnant farmworkers and those who live near fields.
The chemical, which has been in use in the United States for almost 70 years, was so dangerous that “it needs to be removed from the market immediately,” EPA announced Tuesday. The agency issued a rare emergency order suspending all use immediately — a first for the EPA in almost 40 years.
“It’s EPA’s job to protect people from exposure to dangerous chemicals. In this case, pregnant women who may never even know they were exposed could give birth to babies that experience irreversible lifelong health problems,” Assistant Administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Michal Freedhoff said in a statement Tuesday.
The move, however, comes more than a year after the EPA released findings that the pesticide could harm unborn babies by altering fetal thyroid levels. “These changes are generally linked to low birth weight, impaired brain development, decreased IQ, and impaired motor skills later in life, some of which may be irreversible,” the agency said.
Advocates say the herbicide should have been banned years ago because federal and California officials have long known its health risks. The EPA has deemed it a “possible human
TY.
>https://open.substack.com/pub/tomwigand/p/cisa-ing-power?r=8t3oo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Is CISA – the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency – plotting a coup d’etat against the United States of America this coming election?
The answer could be: YES.
American Discerner by Thomas Wigand is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Coup d’etat sounds like a strong phrase. It is. An online dictionary defines it thus: “a sudden and decisive action in politics, especially one resulting in a change of government illegally or by force.”
Related to the 2020 election, most refer to it as having been “stolen” from President Trump. That would have been accurate had the act merely been the Democrat Party cheating as an act of political ambition only; to only serve to the benefit of the Democrat Party as a political competitor to the Republican Party.
It is fair to say that the plot around the 2020 election was far more widespread, involving government agencies, business interests, elected officials (probably of both major parties) and, likely, foreign governments. Actually, likely multiple foreign governments – and their compromised / treasonous U.S. citizen operatives. Here’s looking at you, China.
So, 2020 was actually a coup d’etat, replacing the duly re-elected President Trump with (what I refer to as) the “Biden-Harris Junta.”
Space does not permit a review of the coverup that followed, but for present purposes recall that then-director of CISA Chris Krebs notoriously claimed that the 2020 election was the most secure ever. Uh huh.
A few months ago American Discerner posted a piece hypothesizing that for the 2024 election CISA might “flip the script” and declare that there were software breaches, perhaps rendering the election uncertifiable, and throwing the selection of the President into the House of Representatives (where the Democrats and sycophant “Republicans” would then refuse to certify Donald J. Trump as the nominee). It is suggested that you read that piece, as it includes relevant information that won’t be regurgitated here.
WELL DANG!
In the last week it’s been revealed that Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin has been openly discussing such a move, even with a certain amount of braggadocio opining that civil war would follow. That’s weird.
And, on July 31, 2024 CISA and the FBI released a statement warning of cyber-attacks on election infrastructure. To be more specific: “we are warning that DDoS attacks against election-related websites could temporarily disrupt access to some online election functions, like voter look-up tools, but would not prevent voting or compromise the integrity of voting systems.”
CISA and the FBI can predict what election functions will and will not be affected by a cyberattack months from now. That’s weird.
As we must with such people, let us parse that press release: “… some online functions, like voter look-up tools” could well be referring to the means by which poll workers identify voters upon check-in.
“Would not prevent voting or compromise the integrity of voting systems” — even if true, in this scenario, would still enable the hijacking of an election. If poll-workers can’t verify if someone’s name is even on the voter rolls, or if a “name” has already voted, it’s not a “conspiracy theory” to suppose that masses of people – such as illegal aliens and/or paid homeless people, etc. – could show up, be unverifiable, but still be allowed to cast a vote on those “uncompromised” voting machines.
That previous American Discerner piece included a link to a One America News montage that including a parade of Democrats decrying the horrible security of electronic election devices. As we know, they all clammed-up after the 2020 election. President Trump and his supporters who picked-up the vulnerable election machine banner were slammed by the Democrats and their supporters as (first) “conspiracy theorists” and then “insurrectionists.” All for raising points that the Democrats had been haranguing about for the immediately preceding years. That’s weird.
Along the way, True the Vote discovered that a Chinese-affiliated company (Konnech) – a major elections-software vendor doing business in the United States – was (at a minimum) illegally storing data about election workers on servers in China. True the Vote alerted the FBI office near Konnech’s U.S. headquarters in Michigan. At first, the local agents were hot to investigate the evidence produced by True the Vote. Then D.C. FBI got wind of it – killed the investigation – and instead sicced the FBI on True the Vote. That’s weird.
The July 31, 2024 CISA-FBI press release doesn’t mention which election vendors’ software are STILL vulnerable. That’s weird.
All-caps “STILL” is used because how can it be that with all the questioning about election machines and their accompanying software since at least 2016, CISA has by its own admission failed to ensure the security of this “critical infrastructure?” This is arguably worse than Secret Service-level incompetence.
Further, CISA still has months before the election to secure such software, and by its own admission is incapable to securing that software. Nor is CISA taking steps that would negate such interference, e.g., going to paper-only. That’s weird.
Or is this incompetence by design?
They’re advertising to the world and the bad actors within it that our election infrastructure is still insecure. Moreover, they’re effectively predictive-programming the public to expect “cyber-attacks” at election time.
This smells like a 2020 coup d’etat déjà vu in the works.
After all, like the proverbial cornered rats, cornered traitors know that they are in a literal “life or death” situation, and so will “by any means necessary” work to prevent a second Trump term. See, e.g., July 13, 2024.
Which is not to say we should give up and resign ourselves to a repeat of the 2020 coup d’etat.
Just spreading the word about what it is they may be setting up for makes it more difficult for them to accomplish it, and far more difficult for them to “sell” the results than they could after 2020. And, of course, getting as many people of faith and patriots registered and to the polls.
With God’s good grace – pray for our country and for the safety and success of President Trump, his family, staff and supporters – and applying our own human agency, we can beat the bastards.
THIS BREAD ENDED EARLY ON ITS OWN
BAKER IS BAKING A NEW BREAD
–BV