Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 5:14 a.m. No.21385007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5012 >>5016 >>5026

Zecharia Sitchin’s Translation Of 14 Tablets Of Enki: Complete History Of Anunnaki

 

https://www.howandwhys.com/14-tablets-of-enki-complete-history-of-anunnaki/

 

Zecharia Sitchin shocked the historical and archeological world after he published his series of books on “Anunnaki gods” who arrived from planet Nibiru around 445,000 years ago. According to him, these ancient astronauts touched down in one of Earth’s seas, and established Eridu, “Home in the Faraway.”

 

The author’s translation of fourteen tablets of Enki explains the history of the Anunnaki civilization and their full-fledged purpose for the visit to Earth. The tablets are the account of Enki, an Annunaki, from a planet called Nibiru. He was the firstborn son of Anu, the king of the planet Nibiru. Nibiru is supposed to circle the sun every 3,600 earth years.

 

Enki claimed [as per Sitchin’s translation] in these tablets to have come to Earth to mine gold for their home planet Nibiru. The gold was needed to repair the atmosphere of their planet. They needed mine workers so Enki created humans on Earth in their image.

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 5:23 a.m. No.21385036   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5039

>>21385003

>The facts about gold mining:

>There needs to be quartz and sea water and volcanism in the past.

Doesn't need to be Sea water, jus has to be a hydro-thermal vent where minerals are present

>it's not found on Earth in any other situation

Correct for planetary mineral deposits

Gold possibly originated from exploding stars

 

https://www.astronomy.com/science/does-all-the-gold-in-the-universe-come-from-stars/

 

Could be wrong, but having mined gold it certainly wasn't ayys that came here to mine it originally

 

>>21385016

>Sitchin is a fraud

^^this

All the Ancient Aliens crap is fraudulent. Grifters.

There are aliens, but not the Daniel Jackson/Stichin type.

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 5:28 a.m. No.21385062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5075

>>21385039

>ancient cultures all share similar tales of extra planetary founders?

We aren't from earth likely, keep in mind stories told just in a room at a table whispered into the ear of the person next to you change just with 20 people, multiply that by thousands.

Humans have a really hard time with the environment (allergies, skin cancer etc) to have evolved on earth originally.

Firmly believe in finding truth, these grifters that sell books aren't that.

 

>NO more a grifter than any priest or pastor in any church on a sunday.

Won't argue with that, religion is a comp'd control mechanism

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 5:37 a.m. No.21385088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5099 >>5182

>>21385075

> gaps in logic that must be reached in order to accept the given narratives.

Follow the money.

 

Always have rejected the dogmatic scientism (it's not science)

Real science questions everything including your own theories.

Now corporations and special interests pay scientists to become priests of Scientism and stand by the theory as a fact regardless how silly it is.

Take the money out of it and you might find some actual science. Science isn't static until there is absolute proof the theory is a fact.

Big Bang theory

Theory of Evolution

You must not questions these - Scientism

 

Wait there are issues with this theory - Science

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 5:45 a.m. No.21385116   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21385099

>just like what happened with covid.

That was to wake up more normies

 

>the cult of religion/ science all fear people thinking for themselves and investigating.

^ Didn't use to be that way, within my lifetime. They still taught us critical thinking

 

>academic institutions and the amount of group think, all because of funding

Absolute truth, sell outs

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 7:40 a.m. No.21385608   🗄️.is 🔗kun

IS THIS A PICTURE OF TIM WALZ?

By Michael B. Brodkorb | June 17, 2008

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20090724222229/https://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2008/06/17/is-this-a-picture-of-tim-walz/

 

For the record, I believe the picture above (man holding “Veterans for Kerry” sign) is of Tim Walz in 2004, years before he was elected to Congress. I showed this picture to six people – four Republicans and two Democrats. Everybody thought it was Walz, except for one of the Democrats who thought it could be Walz.

 

I will have a tough time getting Congressman Walz’s staff to confirm if this is Walz, so I thought I would post the picture and let you voice your opinion. Again, I believe it is Walz. I will explain the story behind this picture later tonight on Minnesota Democrats Exposed.

 

UPDATE: I was organizing some old pictures last week and I found this picture in my files. This picture was taken by me on August 4, 2004.

 

I was working for the Republican Party of Minnesota and I was driving with a family member to President Bush’s rally in Mankato. This picture is from a series I took of protesters on the road to the leading to the event. I believe this is a picture of Walz protesting President Bush’s visit to Mankato in 2004.

 

Walz has frequently told a story about how he and two students were kicked out of President Bush’s event because one the students had a Kerry for President sticker on their wallet. Nick Coleman of the Star Tribune wrote an column about the alleged incident. From the column:

 

“After riding a Bush bus to the quarry, Walz and the kids got off to go through the metal detectors and have their IDs checked. Bush officials took the kids aside and thoroughly inspected them. When one was discovered to have a Kerry sticker on his wallet, they were ordered back onto the bus.

 

Walz objected, and he was asked to leave, too. ‘You’re not welcome,’ a Bush guy said. ‘Get back on the bus.’

 

Walz said he had a right to see the president.

 

So you support the president? a Bush guy asked. I didn’t say that, said Walz. Then you’re an opponent? I didn’t say that, either, said Walz, thinking it was nobody’s business.

 

‘If you don’t get on that bus,’ the guy said, ‘you’ll be detained by the Secret Service for interfering with a presidential event.’

 

‘I don’t want to get arrested,’ Walz said. ‘My wife will get mad because I’m supposed to pick up our daughter [Hope, 3] and make dinner. Do you really want to arrest someone who just got back from overseas, because he wants to see the president?’

 

The Bush guys backed down. They said they’d do him a favor if he behaved himself. He ignored the insult. They said the Secret Service was watching him. They let him in.” Source: Star Tribune, August 13, 2004

 

Notice how Coleman’s column never mentioned that Walz likely protested outside President Bush’s event? But wait, the best part of the article is yet to come:

 

“Walz listened. And made up his mind. On Wednesday, he was named Blue Earth County manager of the Kerry campaign. In case you have forgotten how America works, that does not make him disloyal. And no one can say he is not informed.

 

Unlike many people, Tim Walz has gotten to see the president.” Source: Star Tribune, August 13, 2004

 

So Walz pretends to Coleman that he was an undecided voter, when in reality Walz was likely protesting at President Bush’s event with a sign that read “Veterans for Kerry.”

 

Finally, there is some confusion over whether Walz was kicked out of the event, or if he was allowed to stay. An article from the Rochester Post-Bulletin in 2006 states that Walz “and two students were removed”:

 

“Walz noted that President Bush remembered the Mankato rally in 2004 where he and two students were removed due to a John Kerry sticker on one of the students’ wallets. ‘That was kind of fun,’ Walz said of the president’s comment. Walz credits that event as one of the most important in his decision to run for office.” Source: Rochester Post-Bulletin, November 15, 2006

 

Please check back to Minnesota Democrats Exposed for more information on this developing story.

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 8 a.m. No.21385732   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5872

>>21385714

 

K. Harris vs. T. Hallinan, 2003

https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2024-07-25-harris-vs-hallinan-2003/

 

With the switch at the top of the Democratic ticket, Donald Trump has become a target-rich environment for Kamala Harris’s prosecutorial chops. “I took on perpetrators of all kinds,” Harris told Democratic campaign staffers earlier this week, recalling her days as, successively, a Bay Area deputy DA, San Francisco’s top DA, and California’s attorney general. “Predators who abused women. Fraudsters who ripped off consumers. Cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So hear me when I say: I know Donald Trump’s type.”

 

While it’s hard to find anyone on the left who doesn’t think a Kamala takedown of Donald on a debate stage would be a boon to civilization as such, one occasionally hears some far-left peeps that her record is a tad too prosecutorial, even as Republicans savage her for being soft on crime. In fact, however, her first election campaign, in which she successfully ousted San Francisco DA Terence Hallinan, makes clear that she long ago navigated the path to being both tough on crime and tough on the conditions that lead to crime.

 

More from Harold Meyerson

 

Hallinan, as his staunchest supporters would readily concede, was a piece of work—prone to so many fistfights as a young man that the California Bar Association had to hold multiple hearings before authorizing him to practice. (Hallinan attributed his often out-of-control pugnacity to a thyroid condition, while his mother testified that he’d begun fighting as a teen in response to the attacks and ridicule he’d encountered because his attorney father was, to all appearances, a Communist at the height of the Red Scare. The Progressive Party that was formed in 1948 to run Henry Wallace for president was still on the ballot in a few states in 1952, and Hallinan’s pop, Vincent, was its presidential nominee. I include this tidbit to give my readers a leg up in any championship round of Political Trivial Pursuit.)

 

In his pre-DA practice as a counterculture defense attorney, Hallinan represented a vast number of people brought up on various drug charges, assorted murderers, and, briefly, Patty Hearst. In office, his zeal clearly got the better of him when a bar fight involving some San Francisco cops led him to indict the department’s chief, who had been nowhere near that bar, and who also was the department’s first Black chief who’d also devised quotas for minority hiring into the department. That indictment managed to estrange a good chunk of local progressives. Having also fired many of the deputy DAs upon taking office, Hallinan also racked up the lowest conviction rate of any of California’s 58 district attorneys. (One case his office did win was a murder conviction for the owners of a dog that had mauled a woman to death. One of the two deputy DAs who won that case was Kimberly Guilfoyle Newsom, then Gavin Newsom’s wife and now Donald Trump Jr.’s fiancée. You can’t make this stuff up.)

 

Harris was one of three attorneys who challenged Hallinan in the 2003 election, coming in second to Hallinan in the primary and defeating him by a 56 percent to 44 percent margin in the runoff. Hallinan himself noted that Harris didn’t really run to his right, winning, rather, by peeling away many of his progressive supporters. As the San Francisco Chronicle noted, “Both candidates supported medical marijuana, opposed the death penalty and said juvenile suspects should be steered away from adult courts in all but the most serious cases.” Instead, Harris emphasized Hallinan’s low rate of convictions (in 2001, having a 52 percent rate of convictions for the felonies he prosecuted, while the statewide average had been 83 percent).

 

That political persona—a tough progressive—certainly worked in San Francisco two decades ago, and is pretty much the median position of today’s Democratic Party. Trump will doubtless assail and misrepresent Harris’s record, but he has more to fear from her prosecutorial sensibility than he has grounds to attack.

 

One further note about the early days of the Democrats’ soon-to-be presidential nominee: In speaking today to an old-time San Franciscan, she told me: “What people don’t realize is that Kamala was older than almost all of Willie Brown’s girlfriends.”

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 8:02 a.m. No.21385747   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5872

How San Francisco’s Democratic political machine led to Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign

 

https://theconversation.com/how-san-franciscos-democratic-political-machine-led-to-kamala-harris-presidential-campaign-236001

 

The political earthquake that has made Kamala Harris the Democratic Party’s nominee for president is a San Francisco story that began more than 60 years ago.

 

The cast of characters includes a chain-smoking, hard-drinking and profane political mastermind; a Polish Jewish activist who fled the Nazis and later became a member of Congress; a Black lawyer and civil rights activist from rural Texas; and the scion of a powerful political family who moved to San Francisco when she got married and made it to Congress in substantial part due to a deathbed endorsement from the refugee-turned-congresswoman.

 

Harris, whose first foray into electoral politics was in 2003 when she won a tough race for district attorney in San Francisco, and Nancy Pelosi, the longtime San Francisco congresswoman who was instrumental in persuading Joe Biden not to seek reelection, can both trace their political origins and their brand of liberal politics to the 1963 mayoral election in San Francisco.

 

The two major candidates in that race were the Republican, Harold Dobbs, and the Democrat, Jack Shelley. Shelley had served in Congress since 1949, had strong ties to organized labor and was seeking to become San Francisco’s first Democratic mayor in over half a century.

 

Dobbs was an affable businessman and one of the owners of a popular diner chain known as Mel’s Drive-In. In the days just before the election, there was a demonstration outside of a Mel’s Drive-In location in San Francisco because of the chain’s refusal to hire African Americans in customer-facing positions, such as waiters or waitresses. The young civil rights attorney who expertly organized that boycott and therefore helped deliver the election to Shelley was Willie Brown.

 

Shelley won the election, and that’s when the pieces started to fall into place that paved the way for, six decades later, Harris having the presidency within her reach.

 

moar at url

Anonymous ID: b9ab40 Aug. 10, 2024, 8:07 a.m. No.21385776   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5872

Sen. Kamala Harris endorses George Soros-backed Sacramento DA challenger

 

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article211093674.html

 

Sen. Kamala Harris and billionaire philanthropist and hedge fund manager George Soros appear to be aligned politically in the Sacramento County district attorney's race. Harris on Monday endorsed a local prosecutor challenging incumbent Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert, who has come under fire by protestors in the wake of the Stephon Clark shooting. The challenger is Noah Phillips, a Democrat and county prosecutor who has similar views as Harris on the issue of racial bias in policing. Another thing they have in common is support from Soros, also a prominent backer of of liberal causes. Soros backed Harris in her 2016 Senate run, donating $5,400 to her campaign. And he's a contributed heavily to Phillips, who has taken in more than $350,000 this month alone to take on Schubert, a moderate Republican. She has faced backlash and protests with activists urging her to file charges against the officers who in March shot and killed Clark, who was unarmed. Soros in recent years has become a major contributor to local district attorney candidates who believe in reducing racial disparities in law enforcement. Politico reported in 2016 that among his goals is "reshaping the American justice system." Phillips this past weekend said there has been a "failure in leadership" under Schubert, noting he'd undertake a review of law enforcement practices to address racial bias, if elected. Harris had a similar message at a Sacramento town hall last month, when she said battling implicit bias must be a priority in law enforcement.

 

Read more at: https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article211093674.html