Anonymous ID: 0b62a9 Aug. 10, 2024, 6:39 p.m. No.21388669   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8740 >>8951 >>9055

Harris shutting down 'lock him up' chants shields Trump's federal Jan. 6 case from even more delays

Any comments Kamala Harris makes that could be seen as referencing the federal charges against Donald Trump could affect his election interference case.

 

Aug. 10, 2024, 7:00 AM EDT

By Ryan J. Reilly

WASHINGTON — Vice President Kamala Harris’ efforts to shut down “lock him up” chants targeting Donald Trump at Harris-Walz rallies this week may be an effort to avoid engaging in the type of rhetoric seen at Trump rallies in 2016.

 

But there’s also a very practical reason for Harris to avoid showing any support for that type of language: Any comments or signs of approval she makes could further delay or complicate the pending federal criminal charges Trump is facing. That includes the Jan. 6 and 2020 election interference case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

 

If Harris wins the election in November, Trump’s Jan. 6 case — though weakened by the Supreme Court — will continue to move toward trial. As sitting vice president in the administration that appointed the attorney general with oversight of the case, any comments Harris makes related to the trial could be fodder for the former president’s lawyers to argue in court that her comments interfered with Trump’s due process rights. That includes any suggestion that locking up Trump would be an explicit goal (as Trump repeatedly said about Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign).

 

When a “lock him up” chant broke out at a Harris rally in Wisconsin this week, she said to supporters, “We’re gonna let the courts handle that,” and used a similar line when the same chant broke out at another rally. “Our job is to beat him in November,” she said.

 

Harris, a former prosecutor herself, has been cautious in her references to the array of civil and criminal cases that Trump has faced in recent years. Harris is aware of the impact she could have on Trump’s pending federal cases and has surrounded herself with Justice Department veterans — including her brother-in-law, Tony West, a former top DOJ official, and former Attorney General Eric Holder, who vetted her vice presidential candidates.

 

But Harris does not face the same limitations in discussing any state and local cases against Trump, or those that have already been adjudicated…

 

(The real reason us she doesn't want to be locked up when he wins. Good cover NbC)

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/harris-shutting-lock-chants-shields-trumps-federal-jan-6-case-even-del-rcna165837

Anonymous ID: 0b62a9 Aug. 10, 2024, 6:51 p.m. No.21388738   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9051

"HE ASKED FOR IT" Victor Davis Hanson on Tim Walz' Meltdown

 

22:20

 

Victor Davis Hanson joins The Tony Kinnett Cast to highlight the critical controversies surrounding Walz the media are currently being forced to reckon with. He outlines the key factors in turning any election around in less than 100 days, and cites the key moments in the late 20th century that "everything changed in an instant."

 

Does Harris have the ability or the discipline to stay away from cameras until stepping onto the debate stage? Will Walz make that avoidance better or worse?

 

https://youtu.be/CUDySEaEowc