realtime disassembly of false narrative.
yes they have watched them be disassembled on 8kun
would it be mean spirited to post the song from the Wizzard of Oz celebrating the death of an evil witch?
the deep state has tried to deprecate the elected government.
they want a useless figurehead president to cement the idea that the president doesn't matter any more.
do you think that will stop the bullies from throwing the ones who oppose them into prison?
Would it really matter?
Does it make the copy almost annoying?
Am I saying that it does?
did others say she faked her death and flew off on her broom to her bolt-hole?
at the college I went to, a 'liberal arts' one, the English classes were designed to teach people to write in a constant subjective tense.
and if one didn't take a triple or quadruble subjunctive tensing as a normal in various 'opinion' pieces, one would be marked down.
of course no one can really talk like that without others starting to make sport of them.
so the writing would be a lot of 'maybe they might have perhaps said that someone could have in some method said <whatever you wanted to express>, but no one would say conclusively'
and crap like that.
of course after a time I realized it was a crappy way to write. And if you keep writing like that you're basically not saying anything succinctly or forcefully.
after the liberal arts degree proved to be a non-job-getter, I went back for engineering.
each year we were subjected to the English professors (young college marxists?) who would have the engineering students write a technical paper and then review it.
So they handed out a style sheet with examples. I already knew what the game was.
the game was that no matter how well you wrote your paper the TA who reviewed it would tell you that you didn't kjnow how to write, and mark it up and make you do a heavy rewrite.
so what I did was to prove the fact I used the style sheet and did exact phrasings in the same way that was shown, of course changeing the words to be about electronics and engineering on the topic of may paper.
when I got back the paper it was all marked up 'all of this is wrong, oh bad engineering student'.
so I showed the style guide to the TA and explained how I'd written the paper.
of course the TA could have said 'oh kay, ya got me' but instead the TA decided to keep up the gaslighting 'Oh, you have last years style guide' at which point I said to that person 'So, what are you telling me, last year you were teaching all the engineers how to write poorly?'
and of course the TA had no response to that because I'd shown how the TA had been gaslighting.
previously I just woudl give them a first draft because all they wanted to see was 'improvement'.
How could they know I already had a liberal arts degree and knew how to write a paper?
my point: they just wanted to be important and be 'experts' and tell the engineers that they were all bad writers.
if the Dems agree on no tax on tips, why don't they agree to do it right now?
that way it can start right away!
cannot you not write in leading questions that gaslight issues and present a false idea to make people who fall for it then seem stupid for spouting it out? Did you fall for the false idea already or are you the one gaslighting this narrative?
will you ever learn to make a declarative statement that is not just a platitude of the quality of 'the best is yet to come . . .'
FALSE NARRATIVE : The Psyop
>>21390995
she seems to be a "shame-scolding, do you know who I am, self-entitled marxist anchor baby cabal carpet-bagger family 'best hope'"
then there was the time I talked about religion with a Muslim professor who then gave me an 'F' for the course. I talked to the dean and my grade was changed to a 'A'.
the one post 'nothing you do is good enough' poster.
No, anon, it was engineering courses that had a requirement for a paper graded by an English TA.
maybe if you had stuff to say you'd say it.
but clearly what you do is the 'You are not OK psyop.'
The Panamanians are a little bit closer to it.
Sounds like maybe his opponents are gaining ground but yes, it does seem to be a news blackout concerning the election there.
everyone has a different path in life, but the gate is narrow and Jesus Christ is the way.
so you know my perspective.
Some people had insight at a young age and were able to keep from that 27-club thing (reaching for the secret too soon) and avoided either self-anyalation or being targetted as a sacrifice.
for me it was cultivating a feigned navitee so that if I got into a nest of satanists, and figured out that they weren't looking out for my best interests, I'd have a self-defense of pretending to be just that dumb.
of course cognitive dissonance was also part of it, so subconsciously I was aware but in my every day it manifested as a lonely loserly personality.
there are things that will make you crazy if you learn of them at too early an age.
there is stuff that you really can't comprehend until you hit a certain point in adulthood.
the 'society at large' pretends all of these are in childhood.
I see another one about 25-27 (for my peer group) and then about 40-45.
some people never mature past the young adult drunk on the make at the bar part of our culture.
others seemingly hit that 40 year old knowledge earlier (through having children and family).
the society is run by man-child people who are still living in that 'hook up and lie about it' part.
they end up blackmailed if they get elected to an office.
For me the 'unsettling' stuff is only unsettling while I dwell on it. I 'let go and let God' which means that I rest well, it doesn't effect me all day every day, and I don't share my grim perspective on demon possession and the hunger-games of the powerful with people who I meet at large. I keep it to my self.
I share sometimes here, because this place is for that. But at the store, or the church, or at the park or on the beach? Random people don't hear my theories on Jezibel demons and how the elites often sacrifice their children.
in correct.
there are things that children can not understand.
they haven't matured to the point where it makes sense.
some people should be around children or influence them. I'm seeing you as that.
should say 'should not be around children, I am seeing you as that, the type who SHOULD NOT BE influencing children.