https://twitter.com/davidcicilline/status/1017516331061702656

(timestamp shows my local JST timezone..in EST this would be 5:09pm)

David CIcilline (D-R.I.), one of the ranting Dems at the Strzok hearing, threatened to release the 11-hour Strzok closed hearing transcripts at 5pm if GOP reps couldn't give him a good reason not to.

Apparently they never gave him one so he sent the full transcripts to DOJ at 5:15, and it's currently being scrubbed for sensitive info.

I'm of mixed mind on this.

On the one hand, more info is good for us autists doing side research.

But I doubt much more relevant info was in the close hearing than was in the open hearing. It was only 2 days ago.

And any really juicy info would be scrubbed under "Nat Sec" or "current investigation" claims.

So what is the Dem's angle here? I doubt Cicilline acted completely on his own here. Other Dems must've agreed to this move, meaning there can't be much damning contents in there for Strzok/Mueller/Dems.

They are clearly trying to paint the GOP Oversight representatives in a bad light.

>>2139296

>>2139303

This feels like chicken dinner to me.

>>2139316

Good point

https://qanon.pub/?#1605

and here diredctly

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1925828.html#1926130

—————

PS "Texts taken out of context"

PS "While emotional over the election, I conduct myself w/ upmost integrity w/o bias while undertaking any such investigation, especially a high-profile case against the POTUS."

PS "In hindsight, it was a bad idea to openly discuss my feelings, but, in no way did those feelings impact my ability to conduct a fair and proper investigation - we followed where the "facts" took us."

PS "I decline to answer that question on advice from counsel."

: When you state "where 'facts' led us" - what 'facts' are you referring to? To date, there has been zero evidence of any such collusion or connections between the Trump campaign and Russia." In fact, the only facts discovered thus far have been between the Clinton camp and Russia and other foreign groups…."

PS "On advice of counsel, I decline to answer that question"

PS "Because of the ongoing investigation, such answers may violate the security of such investigations………."

: "Mr S, I believe nobody here is buying what you are selling. I believe there was/is a serious effort on the part of people more senior than you to remove Mr Trump from office out of fear of what this Administration may uncover. I believe you are being dishonest in your answers and frankly shocked you agreed to come here today. I believe everyone on this panel (minus those from the other side of the aisle) knew exactly what your answers would be and if you think we are going to sit here and accept these answers you would be a foolish. We are also following the facts and once we uncover more (which we will) we will act accordingly. I'm glad you retained counsel - you'll need one and hopefully they are very good."

………………….

Q

————