When Trump first announced his policy idea of no taxes on tips, anon thought the radical left must have been angry and pissed off that they didn't have that as their narrative. Like a lost opportunity.

So of course they had to steal it.

The White House just said that Biden supports Trump's NO TAX ON TIPS, after Biden-Harris sent the IRS after tips!

SUCH LIARS!

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1823061756765253948

"Time" is run by pedophiles. Change my mind.

=The same author of this crappy Guardian piece calling for ⁦

@elonmusk⁩ to be arrested for incitement wrote a whole novel (under pseudonym) wet-dreaming about the assassination of President Trump.⁩==

All the mind virus cult does is project.

https://x.com/DouglasKMurray/status/1823046022412812757

You can tell the globalist fascists and communists are losing the narrative battle because they are losing their minds just because two individual human beings are going to have a dialogue in public.

Just two people having a dialogue for the world to see, and they are blasting the sky is falling, they are threatening them with extortion and extradition, all because they are consenting adults having a consensual conversation that the world can see.

The fact they consider a voluntary consensual act between two adults that bad, is proof positive that they are scared shitless. They are themselves the "phobes" they accuse the world of being.

This anon would not be scared or concerned about ANY two individuals volunteering to have a dialogue, no matter who those individuals are.

Yet the most "powerful" institutions on planet Earth are absolutely terrified of it?

How can two individuals, among over 8 billion, having a dialogue for the world to see, be that bad for those losing their minds over it?

Contrary to the accusers and those issuing threats being viewed as having any moral high ground, their actions are proof positive demonstrating that their interests are strangely highly dependent on censorship of other people's speech, which signals that they are up to nefarious activities themselves that they don't want to come to light by way of such speech.

They can pretend that they are only trying to reduce "disinformation" and "hate speech", but to have this much interest in controlling what other people say, signals that the censors are hiding incriminating information and are threatened by the free flow of information about their activities.

Every time some unelected bureaucrat lectures anyone and postures themselves as authorities over what is and what is not "hate speech", are themselves speaking hate speech for falsely labelling speech to be what it is not.