>>21411268, >>21411297, >>21411357, >>21411504, >>21411582, >>21411610, >>21411623 WHO declares monkey pox emergency CMZ - WE WILL NOT COMPLYPN

Dr. Malone: Reveals the Medical Industrial Complex with all the big players, countries and 5 eyes are working on this are releasing psychological manipulation Big Time, on the world with all this fear porn, they are ramping it up, must listening, he's doing conferences to detail exactly what they are doing WW, this is big. This is much bigger than anyone knows. Fauci Not Worried About Trump Going On "Political Vendetta"

13:58

https://rumble.com/embed/v58i11x/?pub=4

ulie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2

This is a major scandal.

It has beenmore than EIGHT MONTHSsince the DC appellate court heard oral arguments in the appeal of Couy Griffin's conviction for the most common J6 misdemeanor–knowingly entering restricted grounds/building.

During the hearing on Dec. 4, the 3 judges (Clinton, Obama, Trump) indicated they would send the case back to Judge Trevor McFadden, who found Griffin guilty of 1752(a)(1) in March 2022.

Griffin's attorney asked for either an acquittal on the sole charge or require DOJ to prove to McFadden that Griffin knew the area was restricted (he did not go inside the building) and knew VP Pence was on the grounds, which rendered the area off limits bc he was a Secret Service protectee at the time.

Either way–the panel strongly indicated they believed foreknowledge was a necessary element to demonstrate guilt.

A ruling of that nature would have caused chaos in DC courthouse, potentially impacting hundreds of cases.

But as the panel weighed its decision, something seismic happened: SCOTUS granted cert in Fischer one week later.

Dem-heavy DC appellate court recognized the threat to the J6 prosecution AND narrative if both the most common misdemeanor and most common felony (1512c2) were reversed by higher courts.

Since SCOTUS granted cert, the court held oral arguments in April and posted its decision on June 28.

That entire time, the DC appellate courtan Obama appointee is the chief judgeSAT on releasing its order related to Griffin's appeal and continues to do so. Normal time btw oral arguments and decision is 4-5 months.

Apparently, this is not concerning to the "legal experts" who have accused other courts of slow walking key opinions in other political cases.

You can listen to the discussion here:

http://cadc.uscourts.gov/recordings/recordings2023.nsf/C3B796AEF25005F785258A7B005450C1/$file/22-3042.mp3

11:25 AM · Aug 13, 2024

·153.9K Views

https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/182338036479604769

Who Is Ilan Goldenberg, Kamala Harris’s New Liaison to the Jews?

Adam Kredo August 13, 2024

Under pressure to demonstrate she is not as hostile to Israel as some might believe, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris on Mondaynamed a campaign liaison to the Jewish community. He is Ilan Goldenberg==, who served as an adviser to Harris on the Middle East before transitioning to his new role. Now he will guide the campaign on "issues related to the U.S.-Israel relationship, the war in Gaza, and the broader Middle East," a campaign aide told Jewish Insider.

So, is it a peace offering?Well, Goldenberg has longstanding ties to the anti-Israel group J Streetand served as a foreign policy adviser to Elizabeth Warren’s failed 2020 presidential bid. Throughout his professional career,both in and out of government, he has served as a public defender of the Democratic party’s criticisms of Israel, a critic of the GOP’s efforts to strengthen ties with the Jewish state, and a proponent of deepening diplomatic relations with Iran. (So he hates himself because he’s a Jew, and this is going to be the one that get jews to vote for Harris? KEK, good luck with that)

During his tenure as her Middle East adviser, Harris has offered pushback on Biden's public support for Israel and support for pro-Hamas protesters in the United States. She did not, for example, attend Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress late last month, and has extended sympathy to anti-Israel and anti-Semitic campus agitators, telling the Nation in July that "they are showing exactly what the human emotion should be, as a response to Gaza." She rebuked the Jewish state in March for sparking a "humanitarian catastrophe" in Gaza and called for an immediate Israeli ceasefire.

Before joining the Biden administration in 2021, Goldenberg participated in a briefing organized by the anti-Israel group J Street in which he described President Joe Biden’s historically pro-Israel view as "old school" and said the United States must "publicly criticize the Israelis"in order to pressure them to accept a ceasefire.

During Warren’s failed presidential bid, with Goldenberg by her side, the Massachusetts senator urged the Jewish state to end its "occupation" and create "an independent and sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip living alongside Israel." Warren skipped AIPAC's 2019 conference and pledged to do so again, saying, "For America to be a good ally of Israel and of the Palestinians, we need to encourage both parties to get to the negotiating table. And we're not doing that if we keep standing with one party and saying, ‘We're on your side.’"

Goldenberg was also a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s approach to the region, panning the president’s decision to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, which he described as a "bad idea" that should only take place if the United States accompanies it with a "formal recognition of the state of Palestine." "Moving the embassy would upend 50 years of American policy, which has held that the issue of Jerusalem can be negotiated only between Israelis and Palestinians," Goldenberg wrote in a piece for Politico magazine, warning incorrectly that the move "could spark violence targeted at American diplomatic facilities across the Middle East."

He was also critical of the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal. Abandoning the accord, he said, would serve as "an invitation to war." Trump's alternative to the deal, he argued, "is a leaky, weak international sanctions regime that will not bring Iran back to the table, but will free it of its nuclear obligations under the deal." And when the Obama administration took a parting shot against Israel shortly before Trump took office, Goldenberg broke with a majority of congressional Democrats and defended the move.

In a January 2017 op-ed for the National Interest, he said the administration's abstention from a U.N. vote condemning Israel’s decision to build homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem was "necessary and appropriate," adding that his former boss "made the right call" to rebuke Israel on the international stage. Then-U.N. ambassador Samantha Power could have killed the vote with a veto, and her refusal to do so prompted a bipartisan resolution repudiating the Obama administration, which 109 Democrats supported.

Goldenberg subsequently argued in a 2020 policy paper that the U.S. must reverse Israel’s "settlement activity" by "ending the practice of shielding Israel from international consequences."

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/who-is-ilan-goldenberg-kamala-harriss-new-liaison-to-the-jews/

The Democratic Senate Candidate Pretending Kamala Harris Doesn't Exist

'When we heard that Kamala was going to be the replacement, we said "That’s good for Tim Sheehy,"' Sen. Steve Daines says

Joseph Simonson August 14, 2024

BOZEMAN, Mont.—One would believe from media reports that Vice President Kamala Harris's rise sparks nothing but "joy" among Democrats. In one of the nation's most competitive Senate races,the new presidential ticket is nothing but a headache.

Sen. Jon Tester (Mont.), who many believed cracked the code of how to win elections as a Democrat in a deep-red state, is on his back feet. Since President Joe Biden ducked out of his reelection race, the self-fashioned "straight talker" is largely absent from the campaign trail and hasn’t offered any thoughts on his party’s presidential nominee.

Vice President Kamala Harris’s rise has forced an electoral recalibration for Republicans and vulnerable incumbents such as Tester, who has tried to convince Montana voters that he routinely stood up to Biden. The timing for Tester could hardly be worse, as anEmerson College poll released Thursday found Montana Republican businessman Tim Sheehy pulling ahead of Tester. Private focus groups, according to Republicans in the state who spoke with the Washington Free Beacon on the condition of anonymity,show Harris is more unpopular in the state than Biden.

If joy was anywhere to be found in Montana on Friday, it was at a rally in Bozeman. National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman Sen. Steve Daines (R., Mont.) brought former president Donald Trump to town for a show of unity. Trump, who won the Treasure State by 16 points in 2020, was introduced by a series of Montana Republicans who could not be less delighted about Harris. Their message was consistent:Tester has betrayed Montana voters and would rubber-stamp a President Harris agenda.

"When we heard that Kamala was going to be the replacement, we said, 'That's good for Tim Sheehy,'" Daines told the Free Beacon. "As Kamala Harris will continue to be defined by who she really is, versus this makeover that’s being attempted at the moment, the American people will see that she is the most liberal of all 100 senators."

Tester’s silence on Harris is conspicuous, given his past praise of her. In March 2023, Tester said that "of course" he supports keeping the vice president on the Biden ticket.

Today it is unclear what Tester makes of his party, which once dominated Montana’s statewide offices but is now in the wilderness with the lowest number of state legislature seats in more than 50 years.

"Like many Montana farmers, this is the busiest time of year for Sen. Tester as he spends a few weeks in August harvesting (as he does every year)," a spokeswoman for Tester told the Free Beacon. "In spite of the demands of the farm schedule Sen. Tester has continued to enjoy meeting with Montanans from across the state, from powwows to meet and greets."The spokeswoman did not answer a question about whether Tester supports Harris.

Republicans are alsofond of pointing out Tester’s direct role in Harris’s political rise. When he chaired the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2015, Tester recruited Harris and personally complimented her "powerful campaign" in his book.

Tester’s race will likely decide control of the Senate in 2025, and Democrats are expected to spend upwards of nine figures to beat Sheehy. But even under the best conditions, Tester will need to peel off a good chunk of Trump’s supporters.

Trump’s appearance in Montana on Friday was meant, in part, to counter that strategy. In his roughly 90-minute remarks at a packed stadium with more than 8,000 supporters, Trump told Republicans not to be fooled and that Tester "is a radical left lunatic like Kamala." "He’s terrible," Trump said before later mocking Tester’s weight and referring to it as a "disability."

Republicans are also working to win over Libertarian Party candidate Sid Daoud, which would serve another blow to Montana Democrats’ strategy. Tester has cracked 50 percent of the vote just once in his three successful Senate campaigns but has coasted to victory, GOP operatives believe, in large part because of Republican defections to the Libertarian candidate who normally siphons off roughly 7 percent of the vote.

With a three-to-one fundraising advantage over Sheehy, Tester’s best hope for retaining his seat is his massive campaign war chest. Hamstrung with a record that includes voting with Biden more than 90 percent of the time, according to FiveThirtyEight,Tester is largely eschewing an issue-focused campaign and is instead making the race about personality.

https://freebeacon.com/elections/the-democratic-senate-candidate-pretending-kamala-harris-doesnt-exist/

>>21412345

KEK that picture is perfect

Billionaires seeing the handwriting on the wall.

https://x.com/JonathanTamari/status/1823383846055768374

Andrew McCarthy: Prepare for Trump to be sentenced to prison on September 18

The objective here is to enable VP Kamala Harris and the media-Democratic complex to label Trump 'a convicted felon sentenced to prison' as voting begins

Published August 14, 2024 12:56pm EDT1/2

Judge Merchan delays Trump sentencing to September

Fox News national correspondent Bryan Llenas analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court immunity case on former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

To the surprise of no one, Judge Juan Merchan has yet again denied former President Donald Trump’s motion that the judge recuse himself. I am speaking, of course, about the case in which Manhattan’s elected progressive Democratic district Attorney, Alvin Bragg, is prosecuting Trump. In early June, a jury found the former president and current GOP presidential nominee guilty on 34 counts of business-records falsification.

It is not just that Judge Merchan had previously denied the recusal motion.

The judge has signaled that, come hell or high water, he intends to sentence Trump on September 18.

If you’re keeping score, that would be two days after early voting in the 2024 election begins in Pennsylvania.

The Trump defense team has been trying to stave off sentencing. And the lawyers have what, in a normal case, would be real ammunition. On July 1, the U.S. Supreme Court held that presidents (including former presidents) are (a) presumptively immune from criminal prosecution for any official acts taken as president, and (b) absolutely immune if the official acts are core constitutional duties of the chief executive. The Court instructed that this immunity extends not only to charges but to evidence. That means prosecutors are not just barred from alleging official presidential acts as crimes; they are further prohibited from even using such acts as proof offered to establish other crimes.

The New York prosecution of Trump was politics not justice. That’s why we call it "lawfare." The prosecutors and judge are not concerned about whether convictions ultimately get thrown out on appeal. There is no denying that Bragg’s prosecutors used some of Trump’s official acts to prove their case.

Indeed, they called as witnesses two of Trump’s White House staffers.

Unsurprisingly then, Trump’s lawyers moved post-trial to have the guilty verdicts thrown out based on the high court’s immunity ruling. Further, they again argued that Merchan should recuse himself. On that score, they claimed the lucrative political work Merchan’s daughter has done for Vice President Kamala Harris should be seen as more significant now that Harris has replaced President Biden as Trump’s Democratic opponent in the upcoming election.

On Tuesday, Merchan denied the recusal motion. He had signaled his intention to do so in a letter to the parties last week. He also said he plans to rule on Trump’s immunity claim by August 16. Most importantly, though, Merchan admonished the parties to prepare for the court to move ahead with the imposition of sentence on September 18. He instructed the lawyers to submit promptly any arguments they intend to make on that subject.

If we may read the tea leaves, Merchan has already decided that he will deny Trump’s immunity motion. There is, moreover, a high likelihood that he will impose a prison sentence against Trump right after that.

By the time he’d issued his letter last week, Merchan had had weeks to mull over the Supreme Court’s immunity decision and Team Trump’s subsequent brief arguing that the guilty verdicts should be tossed out. He told the parties to get ready for sentencing anyway. Obviously, if Merchan had any intention of vacating the verdicts, or of recusing himself, he would not have stuck to the sentencing date.

https://archive.is/2butT#selection-1381.0-2231.97

>>21412430

2/2

I suspect that Merchan will rationalize that Trump (a) was not charged based on official presidential acts, and (b) would have been convicted even if Bragg’s prosecutors had not introduced arguably immunized evidence.

Such a ruling might be wrong, especially on the latter point (at trial, prosecutors described some of the testimony from Trump staffers as "devastating"); but Merchan made so many outrageous rulings in the case that it would be foolish to expect him to change course now.

In fact, my own view is that, even more than the Supreme Court’s immunity decision, another of its late-term rulings will bolster Trump’s eventual appeal – Erlinger v. United States. There, the Court reaffirmed that in criminal cases, important proof elements affecting the potential sentence must be found unanimously by the jury. Merchan, to the contrary, denied Trump the right to a unanimous verdict on the supposed crime (conspiracy to influence the election by illegal conduct) that Bragg alleged Trump was trying to conceal by falsifying his business records.

That crime is what turned a misdemeanor into a felony, and what allowed Bragg to get around the two-year misdemeanor statute of limitations.

But this brings us to the main point. The New York prosecution of Trump was politics not justice. That’s why we call it "lawfare." The prosecutors and judge are not concerned about whether convictions ultimately get thrown out on appeal. And it’s not like Merchan is actually going to put Trump in prison; it is virtually certain that Trump will get bail pending appeal, so Merchan can appear to impose a stiff incarceration sentence without any real incarceration – at least for now, and probably ever.

The objective here is to enable Vice President Harris and the media-Democratic complex to label Trump "a convicted felon sentenced to prison" just weeks before Election Day, at a time when Americans will already have started voting in many states, not least the potentially decisive Pennsylvania battleground.

Prepare for Merchan to deny Trump’s immunity claim … and strap in for sentencing on September 18.

https://archive.is/2butT#selection-1381.0-2231.97