Anonymous ID: 54d249 Aug. 14, 2024, 12:23 p.m. No.21411716   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1961 >>2084 >>2271 >>2390 >>2434

Judge Juan Merchan again declined to recuse from former President Donald Trump’s New York case on Tuesday, denying that his daughter’s alleged ties to Vice President Kamala Harris create a conflict.

Merchan wrote Trump offered “nothing new” for the court to consider, but merely “repeated arguments that have already been denied by this and higher courts.” Trump, who was convicted in May on 34 counts for falsifying business records, has argued since before the start of his trial that Merchan should recuse from the case due to his daughter’s work at the political consulting firm Authentic Campaigns, which provides services to Democratic clients.

“This Court now reiterates for the third time, that which should already be clear — innuendo and mischaracterizations do not a conflict create,” Merchan wrote. “Recusal is therefore not necessary, much less required.”

Trump’s attorneys wrote in a July 31 letter that Merchan’s daughter “has a long-standing relationship with Harris, including work for political campaigns.”

“She has obtained—and stands to obtain in the future extensive financial, professional, and personal benefits from her relationship with Harris,” his attorneys wrote.

“Although Authentic restricted its Twitter account following scrutiny of the recusal issue, the company’s public Twitter profile currently features Harris,” Trump’s attorneys continued. “According to public reports around July 29, 2024, Authentic’s founder—a partner and colleague of Your Honor’s daughter—leads a group called ‘White Dudes for Harris,’ which has raised millions of dollars for Harris’s current campaign against President Trump.”

 

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2024/08/14/judge-again-declines-to-recuse-from-trumps-case-denies-daughters-alleged-kamala-harris-ties-create-conflict/

Anonymous ID: 54d249 Aug. 14, 2024, 12:26 p.m. No.21411731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1961 >>2084 >>2271 >>2390 >>2434

Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney Shea Sanna is filing a lawsuit against George Soros-funded District Attorney George Gascón, alleging he was subjected to a “retaliation campaign” after he misgendered a transgender child predator, who was later found guilty of molesting a 10-year-old girl.

Sanna repeatedly referred to Hannah Tubbs, a transgender woman, as a man while prosecuting him for sexually assaulting a child.

However, the case’s judge rebuked Sanna and a superior at the district attorney’s office for not using the correct pronouns.

The deputy district attorney was later suspended without pay after the district attorney’s office found he intentionally “misgendered” Tubbs.

“Tubbs is a violent sex offender,” Sanna said in 2020 after a judge reminded him that the defendant identified as a female, The Los Angeles Times reported.

In 2023, Tubbs pled guilty to manslaughter for beating his friend to death with a rock in 2019, according to Fox News.

Tubbs was tried when he was 17 after he assaulted the 10-year-old girl, The Los Angeles Times reported.

 

https://disswire.com/soros-da-faces-legal-action-for-punishing-prosecutor-who-misgendered-pedophile/

Anonymous ID: 54d249 Aug. 14, 2024, 12:30 p.m. No.21411762   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1792

The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) has issued a statement in support of academic boycotts, a seismic decision which reverses decades of policy and clears the way for scholar activists to escalate their efforts to purge the university of Zionism and educational partnerships with Israel.

“We … recognize that the committee’s position opposing academic boycotts has been controversial, contested, and used to compromise academic freedom,” the organization said in a statement issued on Monday. “When faculty members choose to support academic boycotts, they can legitimately seek to protect and advance the academic freedom and fundamental rights of colleagues and students who are living and working under circumstances that violate that freedom and one or more of those rights. In such contexts, academic boycotts are not in themselves violations of academic freedom; rather they can be considered legitimate tactical responses to conditions that are fundamentally incompatible with the mission of higher education.”

Coming amid a bitter debate about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on college campuses and Israel’s war to eradicate Hamas from the Gaza Strip, the statement does not mention the Jewish State specifically. However, its countenancing the anti-Israel boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement — whose proponents believe that expelling Zionism from major cultural institutions is a first step toward Israel’s destruction — is clear, higher education watchdog AMCHA Initiative said on Monday.

“The AAUP’s decision to green-light academic BDS and reverse a decades-long policy opposing it is not just a catastrophe for Jewish student and faculty, but for the future of higher education in America,” it said. “By giving license to an academic boycott that encourages faculty to replace genuine scholarship with political activism whose express goal is to destroy the Jewish state and rid US campuses of Zionism and Zionists, the organization that has been setting the standards on academic freedom since 1915 just made a mockery of every single one of its own standards and is unleashing a tsunami of academic antisemitism that will echo the darkest chapters of Jewish history.”

Another higher education group, Faculty Against Antisemitism Movement (FAAM) described the AAUP’s decision as “wrong,” arguing that “academic boycotts contradict core principles of our higher education system — open inquiry, unfettered intellectual exchange, and academic freedom. And they are a core tactic of the BDS movement.”

Founded in 1915 by John Dewey and Arthur Oncken Lovejoy, the AAUP comprises over 370,000 members from higher education institutions across the US. Once regarded as a guardrail preventing the politicization of higher education, it has in recent years been disparaged — by nonprofits such as the National Association of Scholars (NAS), for example — for allegedly becoming a partisan advocacy group for the far left.

Following Hamas’ massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, two and a half weeks passed before the AAUP commented on the ensuing conflict between Israel and Hamas, and when it did, the group said nothing about the Palestinian terrorist group’s atrocities, instead discussing the importance of academic freedom. At the time, dozens of professors were denounced for cheering Hamas’ violence and encouraging extreme anti-Zionist demonstrations in which masses of students and faculty called for the elimination of the Jewish state “from the river to the sea,” which is widely considered a call for genocide.

On Tuesday, Peter Wood, author and president of the National Association of Scholars, told The Algemeiner that it was once “indisputably true” that the AAUP was a “leading champion of academic freedom.” However, he added, with its latest statement the organization “finally crossed the line into outright political action — action that reversed one of the AAUP’s long-standing commitments to academic freedom in favor of academic coercion.”

He continued, “The AAUP’s ‘Statement on Academic Boycotts’ should be seen as another benchmark in the progress of academic antisemitism. The AAUP appears to be ready to abandon more than a hundred years of advocating for principled neutrality among faculty to lurch into support for academic boycotts. It is, however, a sly statement and employs finesse to advance its dubious cause … The campus is a special place, set aside for free intellectual inquiry, and in no way suited to the dynamics of mass conformity. By opening the door to academic boycotts, the AAUP undermines academic freedom. And by opening that door right now, it offers cover to the antisemites who are using BDS as one of their covers for their campaign to destroy Israel.”

 

https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/08/14/catastrophe-jewish-students-historic-body-university-professors-approves-academic-boycotts/

Anonymous ID: 54d249 Aug. 14, 2024, 1:24 p.m. No.21412011   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21411993

i curious about biden's speech at the convention

will he just smile and go along with the fuckery that happened to him, or will he tell the truth and lash out at those san francisco commies, pelosi and knee pads, who are both controlled by soros

Anonymous ID: 54d249 Aug. 14, 2024, 1:47 p.m. No.21412173   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2182 >>2192

>>21412159

Trump will win the vote

knee pads will refuse to concede

joe and knee pads will refuse to vacate the offices of President and Vice President

the military will be called upon to decide the matter

Anonymous ID: 54d249 Aug. 14, 2024, 2:07 p.m. No.21412301   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2390 >>2434

How the federal government taxes Social Security benefits

 

Social Security is subject to federal income tax when annual combined income exceeds certain thresholds. "Combined income" for IRS purposes equals the sum of three different figures:

One-half of Social Security benefits.

Adjusted gross income (AGI).

Nontaxable interest.

Single filers will owe taxes on their Social Security if their combined income is $25,000 or more. Married couples filing jointly will owe taxes on their Social Security if their combined income is $32,000 or more.

However, there are two different tax thresholds. People with combined income in the lower threshold will pay taxes on 50% of their benefit, and people with combined income in the upper threshold will pay taxes on 85% of their benefit. The following chart shows the combined income thresholds.

Some people confuse the taxable portion of benefits with the tax bill. They are not the same. If 50% of benefits are taxable, that means 50% of Social Security counts toward taxable income. It doesn't mean 50% of benefits are paid in taxes. What a beneficiary actually pays depends on one's federal tax bracket and the associated tax rate.

 

https://www.fool.com/retirement/2024/02/18/social-security-will-you-pay-taxes-on-benefit-2024/