>>2141686

>Highly intelligent interdimensional shape shifters

>Get caught with sloppy texting opsec

Pick one

>>2141764

Listening in…

Something about Mueller and DOJ national security counsel were just seen at the Federal courthouse.

Possible indictment happening.

>>2141773

>Interesting timing RR making his announvement (whatever that is) at exactly the same time that DJT is meeting the Queen at Windsor

Like something out of the GodFather

Perhaps returning an indictment that fingers someone connected to British intelligence?

That would be a massive fuck you to her.

>>2141844

>>2141856

>>2141866

Fucking amazing if these two events are related.

I can't believe he's making the Queen wait.

What a baller.

>>2141912

>RR presser is a warning to Trump

Interesting to see how this plays out.

Either its to fuck with Trump, or coordinated.

This will indicate who's really in power right now.

12 Russian intelligence officers indicted

Related to DCLeaks

Trump pulling in now.

Trumps license plate

QYI8 AVU

Q

Q

Q

>>2142037

I guess its really a "O"

Looked like a Q

>>2142109

>>2142110

This is related to DCLeaks.

It was a different leak. Meant to be a distraction.

Probably a false flag that would lead back to cabal intelligence.

Adam Carter at g-2.space from months ago -

This (DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0) was an extension of the effort to discredit Wikileaks and create false attribution in an effort to discredit leakers and whistle-blowers, tainting everything with an association to its faux-"Russian hacker" persona.

>>2142339

Read more - https://g-2.space/dcl/

So… we've got the fact Guccifer 2.0 had a password to the Sarah Hamilton leaks on DCLeaks (which he could have been provided and may have been responsible for uploading content to) and we have a bizarre theatrical performance using multimedia props that BadWolf/BadVolf (or a BadWolf imposter) and Guccifer 2.0 seem to have put on for the benefit of databreaches.net

Do BadWolf, Guccifer 2.0 and the MP4s prove DCLeaks-Guccifer2.0 collusion? - No, they demonstrate yet another example of trying to bamboozle reporters with easily fabricated materials and, as the databreaches article reports, fail to actually demonstrate a genuine breach of access through any independently verifiable means, coming up with excuses when such evidence is requested.

Do either of these things prove any definitive ties between Guccifer 2.0 and the DCLeaks.com site's leadership beyond Guccifer 2.0 providing uncontroversial Hamilton leaks? - No, of course not!