>>21416693 (lb)
>the 'baring false witness' thing is voided by that book?
That's not how it works, Anon. Non-Christians aren't beholden to Christian mythos, just like Christians aren't beholden the Judaic mythos and the Islamic mythos.
>seriously?
Yes, seriously. Your religious beliefsendwith you. Just like theirsendwith them. You don't get to project your religious ideology upon them, just like they don't get to project theirs upon (you). Seems the problem stems from the idea of religion, itself and not any one specific religious idealism.
>so it really is a satanic book?
From a certain point of view, yes. In their eyes, however, they are the Chosen Ones™ and above the contestation of non-believers. Whatever the case may be there are inherently evil beliefs written in the Talmud by Rabbis. At least, from my point of view. I'm not okay with one group being heldaboveothers merely based upon religious idealism. That goes foranyreligious idealism. If you want the right to practice your beliefs, but you don't accept another's right to practice their beliefs, then your beliefs aresupremacistand I, for one, do not hold those ideals. You can believe whatever you want, so long as doing so doesn't permit you to act unlawfully. Religion doesn't save you from the consequences of violating Common Law.