Kek, but true.
Funny how you conveniently left out the quote marks surrounding the poster's word (fact). Indicating that the word (fact) was questionable from the poster's perspective.
Trying to steer the narrative?
You are suspect.
Original post:
>What a retarded "fact"
>What image?
Nope, this one is simple.
They just can't be bothered to check their work.
Lazy motherf*ckers
F&G
>Couldn't be a message to someone else though could it, that'd be crazy
Absolutely it could. However, the vast amount of shit-tier work Anon sees in MSM news articles inclines me to believe they are just shite at their jobs. For the most part.