i've read the indictment
and i realized something.
if clinton had been elected,
yeah, she could have covered her crimes
but think about the ACCESS that would have given the russians to the white house.
they completely pwnd the DNC and DCCC. passwords, usernames…all of it. there's no telling WHO still has access to some staffer emails. that shit is pervasive…if one stupid kid didn't change his login, they STILL have an attack vector.
two sets of files.
and transfer speeds aren't a part of metadata.
they are looking at file create/file modify time deltas.
if the entire collection was copied/zipped/uploaded OR downloaded to a thumb after, the deltas would still be very short.
the "transfer speed" argument doesn't hold enough water to prove leak or disprove hack.
>https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
first of all, peace, anon. i love ya, and i hope all of this turns out for all of us.
simply put, though, we disagree - so i want to restate my position, and you can have yours, but i want to be clear.
#1 even if such a field existed, you're relying on a single source (who made a conversion error in the report)
#2 even if that speed is legit, it's feasible at the time
#3 all meta data can be fudged, it's not a perfect record. if you can read something, you can overwrite something
i believe that it was legit hacked, and i also believe that seth rich downloaded the docs from inside.
i also have yet to see any REPEATABLE proof that any such 'transfer speed' metadata a) exists and b) can't be falsified.
it's all moot - whether it came from inside or outside, the organization was compromised, period. DNC = FUCKED DCCC = FUCKED Clintons = DOUBLE FUCKED
and if she had been elected, that compromise would still be in the middle of our gov't.
dude - i'm with you.
all i'm saying, said then, and continue to say
is that that metadata cannot be trusted, because the source cannot be trusted.
the true conversion rate of the alleged field puts it near 180Mbps. my company had multiple 1Gbps connections in 2016. for a site-to-site connection, a transfer at that speed is feasible.
(it doesn't prove or disprove anything - it's just a thing)
would be interesting to see how many times he's said this.
if it's his boilerplate "i'm a good guy, heyuck", that burns the proof.
but - in any case - nicely spotted.