We dug on that post a bit last night after it was made.
Do you have any ideas?
Rereading this post with a clear mind.
Everything hinges on the last paragraph.
Read:
What if THIS SOMEONE told YOU that they shared something with US.
The Video.
3 people in reference.
THIS SOMEONE - The anon.
YOU - the reader.
US - Q team.
So the post is just a long winded way of saying that they were given some intel by an outside source that can be used legally.
Whoever made that post did not do a good job of weaving the narrative correctly, but I appreciate their effort to keep us in the loop.
Yup, something like this would make sense.
This is probably what the post was trying to get at.
I'm confident that we dug on this earlier and found that the files were transferred off the DNC servers at the rate that USB transfers normally take place. I forget the exact number, maybe 23.5 MB/s or something.
We then dug on USB transfer speeds and found them to be very similar.
Others have it all.
Q team has it all.
We have crumbs.
Yeah I agree that the meeting is important.
In all likelihood the crypto markets are at or near the bottom, so the shills have been redirected to here since they can no longer spam the red wojacks anywhere else.
The crypto markets can still go lower though, this post is not trading advice
Everyone is 'our guy' when the alternative is hanging from a noose.
I see what you are getting at.
I always assumed that the info they were providing was based on actually monitoring the connection off the DNC and its servers somehow.. but if they were just using metadata or deltas then yeah, there could be an issue there.
It's a big deal.
It's a huge deal.
But it's not going to happen overnight.
Investigation into all the foreign entities (cabal arms) that worked to rig the election in favor of Hillary.