I think he is security, not a lawyer
Crowd Source This Theory
What if the alleged affair between Strozk and Page was all a lie to set a stage for how the texts would be perceived?
By saying it was texts between two lovers it softens the blow and implied bias of two colleagues discussing these topics.
Telling your side piece "We will stop it" is much different than telling a co-investigator.
We have read the texts, they don't seem to flirt or even imply a relationship of more than two co workers that I can recall.
Catch them in this lie, and the entire narrative gets blown up.
Thoughts anons, has anyone else thought tis before?
Well, good to know I am not the only one who thought this. I have never seen this discused but like many Anons(been here since Late Oct) I have a hard time keeping up with all that Anons discuss when life gets in the way. Hard enough to stay on top of Q posts sometimes.
Some notes though, I know we haven't seen all the texts and there could be more making their relationship more obvious, but have any of us seen it, is it anything public?
And also in regards to this, part of my point would be to prove this. Maybe get a reporter to stat asking questions to blow up the narrative.