>>21435880 (pb) Bricks in Chicago
Anons, the article referenced uses a post from X with the pic of the bricks. The problem is that the pic is from November 2021 according to Tineye.
We need some sauce on the "bricks in Chicago" claim.
>>21435880 (pb) Bricks in Chicago
Anons, the article referenced uses a post from X with the pic of the bricks. The problem is that the pic is from November 2021 according to Tineye.
We need some sauce on the "bricks in Chicago" claim.
Not been on here all weekend. But no newfag here. Pathetic.
ffs, we have falsehoods in notables and you call it a slide to point it out. Then have the tits to call me newfag. At the least have a notable that's calls out the bullshit. Kys.
Thank you.