Kek. If you only knew how square hole things are.
Kek, but it's okay when it's done for Jewish Interests™.
>Krappenstein
>they want a law written on feelings?
No. They feel that Jewish Law, aka the Talmud™, is the de facto standard and elevates them above the rest of us, who are mere animals, so their book says.
>the only difference between the two are how they feel about one group over the other
No, Anon. They are the Chosen Ones™. Their Talmud™ says so and the rest of us non-Jews are merely meant to serve them. Yes, they really do believe that bullshit. Not all of them, but the majority do, as it's ingrained in them from a very young age, through religious ideology.
Kek. The Emhoff creature is so revolting.
Kek. Been wanting to play with this one. Thanks, Anon. o7
>she gonna want to have those tatts removed or covered when she gets a little older
She defiled her body. She won't be able to be buried in a Jewish cemetery, 'cos of the tats.
Kek. Was it a crime or was he finally picked up for saying all those mean, hurty things about the Chosen Ones™?
[MOS]
>I do not recall God calling the "Jews" the Chosen.
Max Miller's God™ does. Jewish State Rep from Ohio.
It amazes me how many Christians™ ignore that part.
>I don't ignore it, I know rome is the synagogue of Satan. The problem is you don't know what it means to be called a Jew.
Of course. I'm not asleep. You're the one that still believes in fairy tales. You do you, Anon. Toodles. o7
>What nonsense are you trying to project onto me now.
Kek.
>What fairy tale do you accuse me of believing?
Quoth you: "I know rome is the synagogue of Satan. The problem is you don't know what it means to be called a Jew."
Fairy tales. As I said, you do you, Anon. o7
>So you can't back-up your accusation.
Kek. THAT is projection, Anon. Keep your bullshit religious fairy tales to yourself, Anon. I can't stand you fucking biblefags….
There's no such thing as a Jew™, Moran.
>peonounced
Kek. What?
>anti-religion extremism to yourself
When did I ever say I was an "anti religion extremist?"
> you're projecting your own projection, accusing anon of what you yourself are doing.
I did nothing of the sort. I merely pointed out how a lot of Christians™ don't even know their own religious ideology, much less their "scriptures."
>Anti-biblefagging is cringe.
Not everyone believes what you do, Anon. Or are you saying that only Christians are allowed to participatein the destruction of the Cabal that has enslaved the Human species? That's pretty fucking supremacist, if you ask me.
>You mean like Q?
I seem to recall Q saying something to the effect of ==IF= you are religious, PRAY. Drop 586. Not everyone is Christian. There are people who are fighting the Cabal, who are irreligious, agnostic, atheist, Buddhist, Shik, Muslim, Taoist, Christian, et al. Perhaps some Christians could benefit from learning a little humility? This is beyond religious ideology.
Kek
>not when the enemy we fight is luciferian and hate Jesus Christ the most, faggot.
So it's always about (you). So typical of one of the Abrahamic Triumvirate™. I do love, though, how you admit that our enemy is actually Christian in nature. Lucifer is your bad guy is he not? So, I guess we have (you) to thank for all this?
>all that other crap you mentioned was invented by [them] in order to lead them asses astray from God.
That's pretty supremacist of you. So their can be only (your) God™? Sheesh. Sounds like you Christian™ types are no better than the Jews™. That's why I can't take any of you Abrahamics seriously. You always throw out the "or else"™ clause.
>>21438487 (me)
*there, not their.