Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:02 a.m. No.21466956   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6998 >>7259 >>7365

Are You Sure Your House Is Worth That Much?

Climate risk is still not being priced into American homeownership.The Green New Scam brought to you by the Atlanatians

By Zoë Schlanger AUGUST 22, 2024, 1:56 PM ET1/2

 

Across the United States, homeowner’s insurance is getting more expensive. In storm-battered Florida and coastal Louisiana, they’ve gone up a lot; the same is true for scorched Colorado and California.But even Ohio and Wisconsin have seen rate hikes greater than 15 percent in a single year.

How much they’ve risen actually means something: Insurers, being in the business of risk assessment, are a good bellwether of the state of reality, andbecause of climate change, Americans’ homes are not as safe from harm, statistically speaking, as they once were. Even residents of states seen as climate havens, such as Minnesota, are watching their rates go up because of an uptick in hailstorms and thunderstorms.

 

For generations, buying a home has been considered a wise investment in one’s future. But as wildfire and flooding turn assets into liabilities, homeownership is becoming a greater gamble.Many economists now think that, because home prices don’t yet reflect climate reality, a new housing bubble is growing. How much bigger it gets will determine how much havoc it will wreak when it inevitably pops.

 

“Homeowners, whether they know it or not, definitely are taking on more risks,” says Philip Mulder, an assistant professor of risk and insurance at the University of Wisconsin's business school. A 2023 paper, for instance, found that U.S. residential properties are overvalued by $121 billion to $237 billion for current flood risks alone.

 

Mulder told me, prudently, that “you can only really know that something was a bubble in hindsight,” but Jesse Gourevitch, an environmental economist at the Environmental Defense Fund and a co-author on the 2023 paper, was more direct: We’re in a bubble, and whether it deflates slowly, causing some economic pain, or pops suddenly, shocking the country’s economic system, will come down to policy choices that governments make now. Jeremy Porter, the head of climate-implications research at the nonprofit First Street Foundation, predicts that the bubble will, at first, seem regional, until foreclosures and devaluations related to unforeseen insurance hikes hit some critical mass. Last year, First Street Foundation estimated that 39 million homeowners were paying insurance premiums that did not reflect the full risk of fire, wind, and flooding to their house. If enough homes crater in value and banks feel the hit, those regional crashes could go systemic.

 

Unlike the housing bubble of the previous recession, this one won’t leave homes to gain back their value over time. The onslaught of wildfires and hurricanes likely won’t reverse course, so neither will uninsurability. In a worst-case scenario, it could lead to mortgage-market collapse: Banks won’t issue mortgages on homes that can’t get insurance coverage. Jeff Masters, a former hurricane scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, recently called the potential collapse of the housing market in flood- and fire-prone states the “most likely major economic disruption from climate change over the next few years.”

 

By some estimates, the risks to the housing market are very near at hand.

David Burt, the CEO of DeltaTerra Capital, an investment-research firm that specializes in climate risks, told Congress last year that, for communities at risk of wildfire, his firm’s models pointed to a 20 percent loss in home value on average in the next five years, and that a fifth of U.S. communities could experience a “Great Recession–like” loss in the value of their greatest asset even under a moderate climate-change scenario. (Burt, notably, correctly predicted the subprime-mortgage crisis of 2008.)

 

Private insurers have a clear-enough picture of climate risks—and their growing losses—that they’re leaving California as well as Florida, where 2022’s Hurricane Ian brought $112 billion in damages. Five private insurers liquidated before the storm that year, and more have left the state since. Homeowners in these states instead have to turn to government insurers of last resort. California’s FAIR Plan, the state insurer, reports that it has already issued double the total number of new policies this year as in all of 2022; it also had about $700 million in cash on hand as of March, when its president spoke to lawmakers about the threat of insolvency.

 

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/08/climate-change-risk-homeowners-housing-bubble/679559/

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:09 a.m. No.21466998   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7009 >>7259 >>7365

>>21466956

2/2

Its liability exposure was $393 billion as of June. And nearly all flood-insurance policies in the U.S. are underwritten by the National Flood Insurance Program, which had $3.7 billion available to pay claims as of March. As Florida saw with Ian, a single bad hurricane can do several times that much damage. These programs simply do not have enough money to bail everyone out. (It is well know that Newsome is deliberately starting forest fires and others threats to get Federal Aid that disappear, and an opportunity for Blackrock and others to buy up their homes and properties, this is a pattern in Democrat run states.So the Atlantic helps them and the Insurance Industry)

 

If these programs fail, or if more places become effectively uninsurable, the economic consequences would be widespread. A state insurer, for instance, would presumably seek a bailout from the federal government. Home values would plummet, just when repair costs soar. People may leave the affected area, shrinking the tax base and drying up municipal budgets. (A McKinsey report estimated that flood-prone Florida counties could lose 15 to 30 percent of their property-tax revenue by 2050.) Banks that issued mortgages on homes would be in dire straits as owners default on their loans. People for whom the majority of their wealth was tied up in their home, which is to say most homeowners, could risk being economically trapped in the most climate-vulnerable places.

 

To forestall all of this will mean actually facing the climate risks of the future.

 

Artificially limiting insurance-premium prices, or subsidizing high premiums, sends the wrong economic message, and kicks the can down the road. “There will still be a reckoning eventually,” Mulder said. “In the meantime, you might create even more development in that area.” Instead, governments could invest in adapting neighborhoods to be more resilient, by hardening and wind-proofing homes, or restoring wetlands so they absorb floodwaters.

Alabama, for example, has a grant program to incentivize people to wind-fortify their home, leading to lower insurance rates and a tax credit.

In places beyond the help of measures like those, the only realistic adaptation may be to retreat to higher or less fiery ground. Mulder says governments should relocate people in those cases. This extremely tough choice will only be made tougher if relocation comes after homeowners have already lost everything.

 

For the most part, right now homeowners and new homebuyers have few ways to learn about the risk their choices pose. Some of this risk could be diffused by giving them the information they need to make better choices about where (and where not) to buy homes. About half of the states in the country have reasonably comprehensive disclosure laws about a property’s flood history and flood-insurance status. But half don’t, and no federal law requires such transparency. First Street Foundation makes its own sophisticated flood-, fire-, and wind-risk assessments publicly available; Redfin and Realtor.com are now incorporating some of that analysis into home listings. Climate Check is another, similar tool. But all three analysts I spoke with wanted to see the U.S. government create a comprehensive tool for homebuyers to better assess the climate risks of buying a house in a particular area.

 

Of course, that could clarify that some places are simply no longer good bets at all, which would be politically unpopular. But without an authoritative, science-driven voice to guide them, homebuyers are at the whims of developers, who have an incentive to build homes even in climate-risky places, so long as the risk is still seen as low-probability or far-off, Porter told me. For now, profound uncertainty permeates the housing market. “We built this climate bet up, and we’re just starting to correct for it,” Porter said.

 

The U.S. is already in the midst of a housing-affordability crisis. The country urgently needs to build more housing. Vice President Kamala Harris (You will have nothing and enjoy it) called for the construction of 3 million new homesover the next four years, as part of her presidential platform. But choosing precisely where to build those homes will have major implications for everyone involved. How the country meets this moment of climate risk will decide whether the housing bubble pops—by far the most painful choice—or deflates, slowly, still painfully, perhaps, but less so.

 

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?

q=cache:https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/08/climate-change-risk-homeowners-housing-bubble/679559/

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:10 a.m. No.21467009   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7014 >>7259 >>7365

>>21466998

Notice the well coordinated between specialists, DS, insurance, professors, etc. etc. etc. that Blackrock and others are using to convince the US home owner, it's a real problem owning a home, and jacking up the numbers of insurance claims, and the push to get people to rent. These climate change numbers used here are over inflated and they are using fear porn, and jacking up house prices to prove their theories are true. Oh and inserting in Harris wants to build millions of homes, like she knows anything about building or anything

 

Analyze the language and words they use, it's pretty obvious they are steering people to freak out and be in fear of having an assett.

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:33 a.m. No.21467154   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7187 >>7259 >>7365 >>7461

Tim Walz Went To War On Zyn While Pushing Free Needles, Legalizing Pot August 20, 20248:45 PM ET 1/2

 

Tim Walz has legalized pot, pushed free needles and is open to psychedelic drug legalization, all while taxing nicotine pouches at a 95 percent clip during his tenure as Minnesota’s Governor.

 

Democrats are attempting to sell Walz as a friend to the working class, praising his “Midwestern values.” His policy history, however, indicates aWalz-Harris Administration may be in favor of crushing the vices of blue collar and traditional America.Walz, who Vice President Kamala Harris tapped in early August to be her running mate, amended the state’s Tobacco Tax law in May to categorize tobacco-free nicotine products like Zyn as “moist snuff,” rendering it eligible for a 95 percent tax rate.

 

Use of adult smokeless tobacco, which includes Zyn nicotine pouches, skew heavily towards midwestern, low-income men living in rural areas, according to data from the CDC and the UK’s National Institute of Health (NIH).

Zyn has also become a popular emblem among proponents of traditional masculinity, with popular voices like Joe Rogan and Daily Caller co-founder Tucker Carlson championing them.The product also became an unlikely political battleground after Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called for a federal crackdown on the pouches.

 

The left’s war on Zyn has promptedbacklash from prominent Republican lawmakers. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are more concerned withpolicing working class vices like Zyn than dealing with the crisis on the border,Republican Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville told the Daily Caller.

 

“Democrats would rather exert more government authority over Americans instead of addressing the surge of deadly drugs pouring into our country,” Tuberville said. Besides adding tobacco-free pouches like Zyn to the state’s Tobacco Tax,Walz also attempted to further increase the 95 percent tax on vape devices in 2021, according to Americans for Tax Reform.

 

He also presided over a number of policies seemingly geared towards legalizing and decriminalizing illicit drug use.Walz signed a bill in May 2023 legalizing the recreational use of cannabis in the state. The bill mandates a ten percent tax rate on the retail sales of cannabis. A few days later he signed the House Omnibus Judiciary and Public Safety Finance appropriations bill, a bill that expanded access to “harm reduction” services and bolstered the state’s Syringe Services Program (SSP).

 

The program, funded through the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), provides sterile syringes and supplies, containers for safe disposal of used syringes and overdose drugs like Naloxone at no cost to users.While removing all language criminalizing the possession of syringes, the bill also legalized the possession of all drug paraphernalia, even that which contained residue.

 

In May 2024, Walz announced his plans for grants providing$100 million for combatting homelessness. One recipient of the grant was Southside Harm Reduction Services, an organization whose services include “syringe exchange, naloxone distribution, education, rapid HIV testingand referrals to social services including housing,” according to the announcement.Walz’s pro-drug policies follow a left-wing trend of decriminalizing and legalizing drugs at the state level that are federally illegal under The Controlled Substances Act.

 

After Oregon became the first state to decriminalize possession of all drugs in 2020,the state’s Democratic Governor Tina Kotek reversed course, signing a bill that re-criminalized the possession of hard drugs in April 2024.

Citizens who voted yes on the bill to decriminalize drugs quickly changed their mind. In 2020, 58.46 percent of voters supported Oregon’s Measure 110, a referendum bill which made the maximum penalty for possession of drugs for personal use $100.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/20/tim-walz-war-zyn-free-needles-legal-pot-95-percent-tax/

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:38 a.m. No.21467187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7259 >>7365 >>7461

>>21467154

2/2

But in 2023, 56 percent of voters believed it should be repealed as the state’s largest city, Portland, saw a surge in overdoses. The number of people who died of overdoses jumped from 610 in 2019 to nearly 1200 in 2022, according to KOIN 6 News.Drugoverdose deaths across the country have risen at a prodigious rate, jumping from 52,404 in 2015 to 107,941 in 2022, according to data from the National Institute for Drug Abuse.

 

While some analysts argue the decriminalization of hard drugs like heroin can drive revenue that can be used for education and rehabilitation programs, others say the costs of decriminalization far outweigh the benefits.

 

Widespread availability of illicit drugs is “the mother of use,” former United States Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare Joseph A. Califano Jr. argued in a U.K. National Institute of Health head to head.

 

Califano referencedSwitzerland’s “needle park,” a government initiative meant to restrict heroin users to a small area.The project “turned into a grotesque tourist attraction of 20,000 addicts and had to be closed before it infected the entire city of Zurich.”

 

He also noted thatItaly, which decriminalized possession of small doses of drugs like heroin, has one of the highest rates of heroin addiction in Europe. In addition to legalizing pot and making it easier for citizens to use needles, Walz green-lit a Psychedelic Medicine

 

Task Force to study the effects of psilocybin mushrooms, MDMA and LSD.

 

“The task force is mandated to explore both the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics and the legal pathways by which Minnesota’s government can help patients successfully navigate the labyrinth of federal laws and regulations in order to get access to these potential medicines,” Kurtis Hanna, a drug law reform lobbyist, told Marijuana Moment.

 

The bill calls for $338,000 of appropriations in 2024 and another $171,000 to fund the task force in 2025. It calls for “statutory changes necessary for the legalization of psychedelic medicine” and “state and local regulation of psychedelic medicine.”

 

Walz signing the bill cleared the way for other leaders in his state to follow suit. In June 2023, Minneapolis’ Democratic mayor Jacob Frey ordered law enforcement to deprioritize the use of city resources to enforce laws that criminalize buying psychedelics.

 

Frey’s executive order stated “that the investigation and arrest of persons for planting, cultivating, purchasing, transporting, distributing, engaging in practices with, or possessing Entheogenic Plants or plant compounds which are on the federal Schedule 1 list shall be the lowest law enforcement priority for the City of Minneapolis.”

 

The psychedelics task force will deliver a final report to the state with findings and recommendations by January 1, 2025, according to the bill. Advocates believe that these steps are clearing a path for the legalization of all psychedelic substances in Minnesota.“If—and hopefully when—I’m re-elected and this task force gives their final report..my hope is to bring that legislation in that session,” Democratic State Rep. Andy Smith told Marijuana Movement.

 

(Ask yourself this: What did the US and Corporations do immediately when the Soviet Union fell? They flooded the country with Oligarchs to steal all their industry, jobs, etc.and flooded the country with alcohol, tons and tons of alcohol. There were more alcoholics in Russia for years and years, until Putin took over, they still have programs in place to reduce drinking. All the women left for foreign countries or became hookers.The west destroyed Russia with alcohol, the West politicians will destroy America with drugs, hence why they won’t stop fentanyl from flooding in)

 

https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/20/tim-walz-war-zyn-free-needles-legal-pot-95-percent-tax/

 

Meme makers, use this picture for EVIL WALZ memes, he's truly insanely evil.

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:44 a.m. No.21467220   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7236 >>7365 >>7461

KEK, Surprisingly No Poll comes out with a positive Job Approval RatingJust imagine what Harris's would be if she got in.

 

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/joe-biden/approval-rating

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:46 a.m. No.21467236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21467220

polls mean nothing except, most pollsters try to get a specific outcome by manipulating the questions or the choice of people.

 

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/joe-biden/approval-rating

Anonymous ID: 1f8297 Aug. 23, 2024, 9:57 a.m. No.21467291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7365 >>7461

Trump Retakes Lead in Betting Odds During Democratic Convention

By Jonathan Draeger

Last updated 08/22/2024, 08:05 PM EDT (Kek the Convention wasn’t even over until 11 pm)

 

Many predicted a bump in betting odds and polls for Harris after the Democratic National Convention as the Democratic Party was given the opportunity to create the narrative around the election – similar to what happened after the assassination attempt against Trump and the Republican National Convention.However, the inverse seems to be happening, as Trump has retaken the lead in betting odds.

 

Right after the Republican National Convention and the day before Biden dropped out of the race, in the RealClearPolitics Betting Odds Average Trump had a 61% chance of winning the presidential election. However, just about three weeks after Biden dropped out and endorsed Harris, she had taken the lead away from Trump. Her lead peaked on Aug. 15 at 8.8 points ahead of Trump, 53.7% to 44.9%.

 

Since the Democratic National Convention began on Aug. 19, however, Harris’ lead in the RCP Betting Average has disappeared. At the start of the convention, she led by 5.3 points in the betting average, but by Thursday Trump held a small lead of 2 points.

 

Polymarket, one of the betting sites used in the RCP Betting Average, also has betting markets for state-by-state election winners.On Thursday it predicted that of the seven swing states, Trump would win Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania, while Harris would take Wisconsin and Michigan. This matches the current head-to-head RCP Averages in the swing states. (That makes sense since WI and MI doubled down on election stealing in 2020 and 2022)

 

Diagnosing why the betting odds flipped back in Trump’s favor isn’t an exact science, but the likely culprit is Robert F. Kennedy’s vice-presidential pick, Nicole Shanahan, saying on a podcast that there had been talks about Kennedy dropping out of the race and endorsing Trump. Kennedy subsequently announced that he would address the nation on Friday “about the present historical moment and his path forward.” If Kennedy decides to drop out of the race, the move will likely shift five-way polls in Trump’s direction by 2.5 to 3 points, as Kennedy drew more votes from Trump than Harris.

 

No specific polls were released showing Trump up more than before. He still maintains a very narrow lead in the head-to-head race in the swing states and is behind in the five-way race in swing states. Harris currently holds her biggest lead in national polling this year, leading in the RCP Average by 1.6 points.

 

However, these polls have yet to consider the main impacts of the Democratic National Convention and the possible Kennedy endorsement. After the convention and Kennedy’s address Friday, the only major planned nationwide events left will be two presidential debates and a vice-presidential debate. With polls and betting markets still closely contested, both candidates are still looking for a chance to break away so that the election isn’t left to a coin flip on Election Day.

 

https://www.realclearpolling.com/stories/analysis/trump-retakes-lead-in-betting-odds-during-democratic-convention

 

This is too freakin funnyShe doesn't even get a bounce, that's how bad the convention is and was.