>7086e7
Failfag mimic. Angry Inch. Simple Legion. Copies one anon's style down to the filenames he uses.
Anon as a group or an individual Anon in that group. Learn to tell the difference.
You are not the arbiter of who is or isn't Anon. Should I have said pattern to appease your pedantry?
Bakers don't delete, BV's or BO or Admins do, get your facts straight.
KEK. Parakeet thinking he's hot shit because he gets his posts removed, not because he's a paid clown shill here to post the last breaths of a division narrative
>But terms have meaning. And Anon is such a term.
And this is QResearch, a place where double meanings exist. I use Anon to refer to an individual Anon, or say Anons, plural, to refer to the group here. Quite easy to understand. To you the word Anon obviously means a homogenous group apparently, it's not wise to assume that's what everyone else thinks and then try to correct them to make them follow what you think. Better luck next time.
>So do I.
>But terms have meaning. And Anon is such a term.
>Anon doesn't have a style.
Individuals can definitely have style. Shills try and imitate it now and call the person they imitate a narcissist, a word you happened to use as well.
Then why did you tell me
All I had to do was challenge the shills' narrative and then start making fun of them for continuing to post it. That's all I needed to do. Besides which, them trying to tell me I'm not "Anon" doesn't mean shit to me anyway. Fuck that Guy Falkes faggotry bullshit. I post frogs, not homogenous faggots that all look the same.
Because style, when it boils down to it, is nothing moar than a series of recognizable patterns. Shills have style. Some Anons have style. Some anons try to fly under the radar and keep as much attention off themselves as possible. Whatever. It is what it is, and now the shills whine and cry about fame and personality and try to emulate the people they're trying to castigate for that supposed sin to them.
>But, there is a difference in pure anon and not so pure anon from a board personality perspective.
Board personalities used to be the shills, then some Anons decided to stand and challenge their bullshit. So now those personalities need to be thought of in the negative light along with the shills. I don't care how it looks. It needed to be done. It's not up to me to tell others who is good and who is evil here, they need to do that on their own and certain patterns can be useful to convey that. It's why they copy now. They don't want anyone recognizing certain individuals here.
>he's still anon in that his personal details are still unknown.
Big fucking deal. You know some personal details. Boo fucking hoo. People that have been posting here for years, every day, don't play the game here the same as they do on halfchan.
They are the Arbiters of Anonymity. Bow to their wisdom as they define the conditions for everyone of what it means to be "Anon." Personal details does not equal address, name, photo, phone number. In a time of war where you need to work together anonymously and the enemy is also trying to mingle in that same sphere of anonymity and fool others, how do you convey good intent? They say the personal details as narcissism apparently, I was opening up without fear to show honest intent, or at least that's how I saw it. KEK! I'm posting under anonymity but I don't claim to be affiliated with that fed controlled faggotry called "Anonymous." With that catchphrase that goes so well in these biblical times: "We are Legion." Fuck those fags.
Because what it really boils down to is they're trying to force compliance. It's about their power and control over what they think is theirs, not about any personality, but those personalities are seemingly a big threat to their power and control over things based upon their behavior and their whining about how they want things to be and certain anons not following rules from another platform.
Not to mention, their version of anonymity where everyone is the same and no one can tell who each other is and if they do just pretend they can't sounds an awful like communism under anonymity to me. I prefer freedom in my anonymity.
>You starting a strawman bussiness?
What became the face of "Anonymous?" Some faggot mask where everyone's face is the same perhaps? Now illegal migrants in the UK wear those masks to antagonize the native born populace. How 'bout them apples for a straw man.
>When you lie about my stance to make it sound like communism, it sure does. Kek.
I didn't "lie about your stance." I stated my stance. It's not about you and it's kind of…. oh what's that word that gets thrown around… to assume so.
Smells like Tranimae faggotry to me. He's the asswipe that's had a bone to pick ever since I asked him why that MuhJoo notable from the bigot namefag Gary was put into notables. I was cordial and got along with that clown and the minute I asked that question it was like a switch was flipped, instant friendly to hostile, and then he changed his story a few times about his reasoning for putting it in there. BO or a BV eventually came along and removed it from the notes and that persona disappeared for about 8 months or so. Then the MuhJoo global was added, shills started getting mocked, so they pivoted to an imitation routine and the main mimic claimed that SP took down Tranimae. I never even knew that was how they viewed it, all it was to me was just asking a question or two.
(addendum)
And that persona came back regularly once the mimicry began. That is the most interesting "coincidence" of the pattern that's been on display for the past year and a half.
>And you stance was to opposing the stance you described me having, which was clearly wrong and a misread (deliberately or not) of my post.
Ah, so me opposing your stance is clearly wrong, or I just misread it? You're a little high on yourself, aren't you?
The even better part, I now see your despairfagging as projection. Enjoy the time you have left, clown.
>Now you are being a nigger.
No, I was prodding for patterns, moving you where I wanted to get what I wanted to see. I know who you are now. Thank you.
I got what I needed from participating in his slide. It'll come in handy in the future.
Can't have someone speaking from their point of view using first person pronouns. That might inspire others to do it. Hard to make a "herd" move where you want when there are individuals in the group that could potentially be listened to over the old guard doing the herding.
Bait persona tics, personal information, and repetitive patterns for them to copy to make auto-filtering and shill identification easy? Huh. Some Anon should have thought of that and tried to put it into practice.