Ok, Mr. Pig, even Vatty just went full on Anti-China.
Your turn next.
It's kinda like the Spanish Inquisition, but on QR it's the Purity Test Inquisition where all namefags have to declare their hatred of random baddies or suffer the consequences.
In this particular instance it's China.
That's Q, I'm talking about QR and its own unwritten rules that many don't think it be like it is but it do.
>2020 Q
Soon
>2024 QR
What calendar are you using, Q?
Luckily the Ultimate Datefag exists to soothe nowfag spirits.
>>21473343
Alright alright alright.
P has been removed from the suspected Chinaman shill list.
Still waiting on Mr. Pig, SP, and Mimic to pass the Purity Test Inquisition.
>Sony for example is a brand that is very valuable used.
Oh yeah.
My Vaio Notebook (admittedly overbuilt at the time) lasted 12 years of heavy usage before the motherboard succumbed to died suddenly.
>>21473394
CM has the Q cred (re_read drops) that Jim doesn't have.
Plus, his Drudge 2.0 newsbot service is pretty good.
That's why it's always been a great tragedy that only a jpg was provided and not a mp4.
He may have ranked higher and thus got his handshake just before Gutz got his.
He has a look of whoa that nigga in the club too??? I must have missed that.
P (and that's the kek part here), both you and Vatty get delete something'd (not using hammer looks gay) here on the regular.
You're both frens when it comes to being in that club.
>>21473461
Shows some empathy for a change.
Imagine the smell of being a young Jim overseas and she takes a liking to you.
Wut do?
Context matters.
The reality in general is that many anons don't refarsh.
Thus, they see 700ish and say ok break time for a bit.
Most breads at 500 true count after many such delete somethings get Bunker levels of slow around here.
My guess is the powers that be just say fuck it get the next one up about it at that point.
Other anons will say it's part of the hide the good shit program.
But, since qresear.ch is rarely up these days and most don't use it anyway not sure if that's even important.
>>21473531
>Stalkerpost Alert!
Dart deletes me every once in a while.
Then he feels bad man about it.
So, I have some cred mfer.
I don't refarsh either.
Too bad QR doesn't do polls because of that anti-consensus rule.
But, I bet it's higher than we (illegal to use here, I know) think if there was one.
>>21473654
Oh yeah it does.
Mainly because of QR Board War history.
Just about everyone has gotten to be deleters/deletees at some point if they were opinionated enough.
It is a 'dasting subject percolating through the bread rn.
There's levels to style mainly ranging from general to specific.
Why not both? is a general style that you and others use.
Many of the namefags (and some non-, too) have a specific style that's either specialized and/or a conglomeration of several styles.
That's what allows them to stand out as individuals while the general style anons can't be pinned down as easily.
Just about everyone here is anon in the where do I live what do I look like way.
But, there is a difference in pure anon and not so pure anon from a board personality perspective.
You wouldn't deny that there are cases where a poster can be identified in that manner, are you?
As I was just telling SP I believe it is moar nuanced than that.
Even tho most oldfags have seen't Tranime's micropeen at some point, he's still anon in that his personal details are still unknown.
He's thus still technically anon is he not?
Even tho many super oldfags have seen't e's rigg posted back in the day he's still technically anon, too, right?
>anon and doxx aren't related - at all - nope not even just a wee bit
Gonna have to poi dog ponder that one.
>This conversation sprang from a discussion about "style"
Yeah, but new tangents come up during the stream.
That's how it do around here every single time.
Yes, but what about general style used by many such anons compared to comprehensive can only be that one anon style?
There are multipleOH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHITposting anons here as well as Why Not Both? anons as well.
Can't single them out without moar info in subsequent posts that combines into sharper specifics.
Vatty, the board isn't ready yet for you to be considered anon no matter if technically true or not.
Maybe later tho.
>only narcissists are crying about "shill" imitating them
Well, yeah, I concur that it's useless to complain about being wronged in this type of environment.
This ain't work where someone can threaten to go to HR.
My only point is that Anon/Not Anon isn't a boolean.
There are levels to Anon and even Not Anon.
>When do you play it?
The datefag angle still remains elusive.
Q could be such a tease tho.
That mf evil bastard is implementing the full MAGA wish list on the X-Twat.
He can't keep getting away with this!
Didn't you use 'bakers' tho?
That implication was that everyone knows the admins bakerer here alongside non-admins in the modern era.
So, you coulda been right and prolly were based upon my glance at the kitchen at the time.
Faith in Q+/Q using the 2016 game plan this time is pretty much what QR is running with best I can tell.
Minus the anons that say we have to lose 1 moar time to fulfil the Prophecy of the Precipice of course.
I'd gladly housesit watching your dog for you if you asked me, Emmy.