>>21483802

>We're allowed to SAY any fuckin thing we want.

Well, step on out there faggot and threaten to 187 Joe Biden or Kammy. You claim that you can say anything you want. Give that a shot. See who shows up at your front door shortly thereafter.

The 1st Amendment does not protect speech that incites or threatens violence and it was never ment to. But go ahead, give it a try. Threaten to assassinate Donald Trump? You probably would get an "attaboy".

Our Constitutions are just words conveying ideas on a piece of paper. With no virtue or will supporting those words…………………they're just words and this is where we find ourselves today. They give one fuck what that Constitution says unless in some bizarre, warped way, they can use it to advance the agenda.

>>21483913

I'm not.

>>21483676

Anon, the !st Amendment applies to "Government". What the "Government" supposedly, cannot do to the citizenry. 1st Amendment does not apply to this board or anything other. You're a fucking idiot if you don't get this.

>>21483958

kek……………morning fren.

>>21483942

Hmm……………..I don't think so anon. Someone twist your arm to run up thousands of dollars of debt? You agreed to the terms of that credit card. You made the purchases. Do you bear any responsibility to uphold your end of the contract?

>>21483928

Every day is Doggy day!!!!!

>>21483973

The "Take Away"? Filth laden liars. All of them. That's the take away.

>>21483996

You are absolutely right about that anon. The government sidestepping the BoR's by using a proxy of like minded fellow travelers is a BIG problem and as such, violates the 1st Amendment even worse. In context, the elected and appointed officals who have conspired to do this are guilty of Treason, Sedition and Subversion.

As for Section 230? The SM companies have operated all this time under the false guise of a "platform". They have used Sec. 230 to censor, manipulate and coerce. They are not a platform. They are "Editors". Section 230 needs to be amended to make the SM companies "liable" and culpable to massive, class action lawsuits. And it needs to be "retroactive". Those motherfuckers would change their ways real quick if they knew that their pocketbooks were now on the line.

>>21484008

Ain't no motherfuckers "handling" my POTUS. Stupid fucks. Hot mics all around Ms. Wang. What a fucking idiot.

>>21484071

Democrats.

>>21483992

Exactly right anon. You are well versed in understanding and interpretating libtard speak and rationale.

o7

>>21484103

Well, no doubt [They] believe it is reasonable. The "government" is still engaged in manipulating, censoring and the SM companies with the exception of X now, are all too happy to help and are team players working towards the same tyrannical goal of censoring anyone who stands opposed to their agenda. There is no justification for the government whether they believe it's reasonable or not, to use their proxies to accomplish the same. This violation of the 1st Amendment is even more dangerous to a free people.

>>21484240

STFU asshat.

>>21484261

STFU asshat.

>>21484265

STFU asshole.

>>21484277

Not.

>>21483607

You have free speech anon. I have the right and free will to tell you to fuck off. You have the right to say it, I have the right to not listen to it. How's that for free speech faggot?

>>21484406

Anxiety? Really? Quit being a weak faggot or do as other anon says. Go back.

>>21484457

STFU ass rimmer.

>>21484473

Justice. Lawful, Constitutional, UCMJ justice. That's how. But that exposes another problem it appears.

>>21484463

Well, they all drew the short stick this morning at the bureau.

>>21484528

Fully agree anon. Not sure how we find our way back. Gonna take a team of like minded Patriots around our POTUS all having ballz of Titanium and a clear and unapologetic mission to restore this Republic. We are getting close to finding out. [They] are the ones who have fucked around.

>>21484587

STFU illiterate.