>I wish there was a feature that let someone know they're filtered, that way the shills know their bullshit isn't working.
You mean like when you block someone on twatter?
This isn't social media. Even if the newfags treat it that way.
>>21484281
>That about the gist?
Appears to be at this point.
Kinda wonder if the hackers weren't maybe no such agency.
Release it all.
RFK in his speech with DJT said something to the effect of "Censorship is never the good guys".
It was a good point.
How Nazi's Defense of "Just Following Orders" Plays Out in the Mind
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-nazi-s-defense-of-just-following-orders-plays-out-in-the-mind/
Modern-day Milgram experiment shows that people obeying commands feel less responsible for their actions
n a 1962 letter, as a last-ditch effort for clemency, Holocaust organizer Adolf Eichmann wrote that he and other low-level officers were “forced to serve as mere instruments,” shifting the responsibility for the deaths of millions of Jews to his superiors. The “just following orders” defense, made famous in the post-WWII Nuremberg trials, featured heavily in Eichmann’s court hearings.
But that same year Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, conducted a series of famous experiments that tested whether “ordinary” folks would inflict harm on another person after following orders from an authoritative figure. Shockingly, the results suggested any human was capable of a heart of darkness.
Milgram’s research tackled whether a person could be coerced into behaving heinously, but new research released Thursday offers one explanation as to why.
“In particular, acting under orders caused participants to perceive a distance from outcomes that they themselves caused,” said study co-author Patrick Haggard, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, in an email.
In other words, people actually feel disconnected from their actions when they comply with orders, even though they’re the ones committing the act.
The study, published in the journal Current Biology, described this distance as people experiencing their actions more as “passive movements than fully voluntary actions” when they follow orders.
Researchers at University College London and Université libre de Bruxelles in Belgium arrived at this conclusion by investigating how coercion could change someone’s “sense of agency,” a psychological phenomenon that refers to one’s awareness of their actions causing some external outcome.
More simply, Haggard described the phenomenon as flipping a switch (action) to turn on a light (external outcome). The time between the action and its outcome is typically experienced as a simultaneous event. Through two experiments, however, Haggard and the other researchers showed that people experienced a longer lapse in time in between the action and outcome, even if the outcome was unpleasant. It’s like you flip the switch, but it takes a beat or two for the light to appear.
“This [disconnect] suggests a reduced sense of agency, as if the participants’ actions under coercion began to feel more passive,” Haggard said.
Unlike Milgram’s classic research, Haggard’s team introduced a shocking element that was missing in the original 1960s experiments: actual shocks. Haggard said they used “moderately painful, but tolerable, shocks.” Milgram feigned shocks up to 450 volts.
According to Milgram’s experiments, 65 percent of his volunteers, described as “teachers,” were willing (sometimes reluctantly) to press a button that delivered shocks up to 450 volts to an unseen person, a “learner” in another room. Although pleas from the unknown person could be heard, including mentions of a heart condition, Milgram’s study said his volunteers continued to shock the “learner” when ordered to do so. At no point, however, did someone truly experience an electric shock.
>holocaust was real
The premmise being that just following orders is a lame excuse anyone will use to get around accountability.
>normies use
They'll come around eventually
The idea and article are about the mental gymnastics a person can use to justify their actions as "for the greater good" or "Just following orders" or "The right side of history"
viewed only through the lens of a single perspective sans free thought/speech
>I’m here to negotiate. You unban my other IP or I go get a simple PS script and join the ranks of spamming this shithole into oblivion
This is not the anon you are looking for
Not able to do what you request
>Enjoy the spam then. Free speech is not a game.
Anon is just anon, can't unban your IP, can't help you in any way other than to say make it rain
Anon doesn't care