>>21486361

but God

>>21486299

>kek, then that would mean…

>>21486417

yup. this anon has a few stories as well. He's on our side when we're on His side.

>>21486632

>>21486609

this anon started investigating CTs in the late 90s. At the time, one got 3 results when doing a search, one of them being this anon's site. Now, it's over 4 million results. Praying for even more exposure and an end to it.

>>21486706

I transcribe interviews and market testing for drugs. Just go to the clinical study that is referenced, dosage and schedules are always in the abstracts and reports.

>>21486706

Here's the report, dig.

Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/

>>21486777

Clinical studies always notate the duration. The powers that will soon no longer be, suppress such info. Ivermectin has been safe in humans since 1987. Safety studies are not needed, so any clinical trials will be helpful, of course. Doctors lost their jobs for recommending it, so there's that.