>waste
What a waste…
Clean your desk anon
I thought Kamala was the one dealing flakes of joy
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/joy+flakes
PSA
If your bought an incantation and it includes English words.
You were scammed.
And you love posting.
>This shit right here is why all of these retarded feminists are running around destroying our Country.
I agree. Women should show their tits more often.
>You want women to be whores?
No I want women to know their place. Hence "Tits OR gtfo".
>Do you have any daughters?
Luckily not.
>Women don't need to go to school to learn how to read & write, they can just suck man dick.
I never said any of that.
To clarify my position on your strawman. Everyone should learn to read, write and basic math (and introduction to programming too, to learn logical thinking) - yet no one should go to school.
If women (and men) knew their place, sucking dick would only benefit their husband.
It's the exact opposite in fact.
Actually, it's because the rest of the internet became feminized, banning anything they deem 'hurtful' and therefore allowing women to control the conversation.
You haven't shown your tits yet. Last warning.
>if they didn't delete posts the breads would be come so full of infantile and sophomoric discord
Can't have humans be humans…
God forbid this board is an actual reflection of the anons that use it.
Fair point.
>>21489125
>humans don't use cutsie words
I see, you are the arbiters of human behaviour.
>I usually get those who say that I'm the one doing the deleting
No one is saying that. You are however advocating for censorship.
>I am not of the mind that errasing grapphetti is censorship.
False equivalency.
>and the kind of brain excrement that gets put here
Then don't come here.
>free speech is about ideas and art.
Wrong, free speech is about freedom to speak.
>the throw-away posts
One mans garbage is another mans gold.
>moderation of a board is necessary.
Reddit is a place perfect for you.
>and the arguing that it isn't, that devolves into abusive hazing, is further discord.
So far I've only seen you insult anons that you deem to be "children".
>>21489215
Kek.
And the irony was that it was advocating for censorship.
Oh the irony.
>>21489222
>how is being a child insulting?
I didn't say, you deeming them to be "children" was the insult…
>no I'm not advocating for censorship.
Yes you are. Censorship of what you think is not supposed to be here, excused by convincing yourself that they must be children.
DELETE ME HARDER SENPAI
>Censorship is not cleaning up the dogshit that someone leaves at your doorstep, and uses a stick to write insults on the sidewalk.
False equivalency again.
>obviously your team is here to disrupt
You are coping so hard anon. You think the only reason anyone would disagree with you is because they are paid actors?
>you merely give more evidence as to why your ilk
These are the kinds of insults I was referring to.
>you only have bullying.
Bullying? Are you high? Do you share?
Kek. Is that so?
>censorship doesn't exist here because anyone can get their own board, anon.
Are all boards created equal anon?
>mushmouth
Are you 7?
>if it were some code being passed between operators in the field.
>is that what you suggest?
Wat?? No. Your premise is completely invalid.
We're having fun on a bun