(not my post)
but that pic is CLEARLY showing antifa being related to the Antifaschistische Aktion of the 1930's germany, which were commies, not nazis…
how did that trigger you so much?
saving the best for last relates to the Pope
saving israel for last is still unclear as to what is being "saved"
I got it anon
just saying I don't think that post wasn't attempting "to pass this antifa is nazis meme"
CLEARLY two VERY different things
oh meant to ask BO
any thoughts on the heisenbug the CM mentioned in his twatt??
just a software/code bug or fuckery?
>israel will not exist as you know it today when Q team is done.
how do you see it?
I think they're moving WAY to close to a theocracy (almost are)
I don't support any kind of theocracies
>But memetic warfare on the boards is a waste of time.
we make them here and spread them
> Go to Instagram and Twitter to find usable memes.
THAT'S WHERE OUR'S END UP
2nd sauce:
https://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Inter-American-Court-Ruling-Benefits-Julian-Assange-20180713-0003.html
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled on Friday the right to seek asylum in embassies and other diplomatic compounds. The ruling includes a mandatory safe process, and the obligation of states to provide safe passage to those granted asylum. Without naming Julian Assange, the ruling was deemed a huge victory for the WikiLeaks founder who has been held up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London since 2012.
The court released a public statement, which said that it had “interpreted the reach of the protection given under Article 22 (7) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article XXVII of the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man, which recognize the right to seek and receive asylum in a foreign territory.”
“In particular, the Court declared upon the relative issue of whether this human right protects both territorial asylum and diplomatic asylum. Similarly, the Court determined the human rights obligations of the Member States of the Organization of American States regarding the host country and, in this case, for third States, in virtue of the risk that persons seeking international protection could suffer, which was the reason for the principle of non-refoulement.
The team of judges who ruled on the case included Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot; Eduardo Vio Grossi; Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto; Elizabeth Odio Benito; and Judge L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire.
In May, Ecuador's president Lenin Moreno eliminated all additional security from the London embassy as it pertains to Assange's presence in the building. According to the National Secretary of Communication, the government "will maintain normal security similar to the level of security at all other Ecuadorean embassies in the rest of the world."
Later that month Moreno said his country will respect Assange's right to asylum but only if he "respects the conditions” his government has put in place for him to continue his stay at their London Embassy.
“Let's not forget the conditions of his asylum prevent him from speaking about politics or intervening in the politics of other countries. That's why we cut his communication,” Moreno explained, adding that his government would “take a decision” if Assange didn't comply with the restrictions placed on him.
the post I replied to about JA had red text dumbass