>>21496141 pb

>This was really weird, because no one had ever seen it before

spoken like a true scientism-ist

lotta science bashing happens on QR

i am a scientist and i can tell you from a long lifetime of experience

the problem is NOT science, but the shocking percentage of absolute morans doing scientific research

pile on top of that the corruption of science by people with shittons of cash and an agenda to push…

nevertheless, one does NOT throw the baby out with the bathwater

one learns to discern

find out two things….

who funded the research

how old are the researchers and how many CITATIONS do they have?

laymen think the number of publications matters

IT DOES NOT

some authors have published hundreds of papers, yet not more than a handful are ever cited by another author

while i have published a handful of papers, but EACH of them has been cited hundreds of times by other researchers

THAT is the tell

>>21496896

>i only dare to believe in scientists that have published something and have been arrested or killed for doing so

not everyone is reckless or naive enough to invite death

better to chip away slowly and relentlessly for an entire lifetime

by the time i got to university, i had already decided i did not want to be "conscripted" to work for warmongers

better to forfeit the trappings of filthy lucre and remain in obscurity than to give the power to destroy to evil people

>>21496775

>fluoride

spreading disinfo is almost as bad as them

it discredits documented reproducible results

let's stick to actual facts with references?

they are damning enough

thx a bunch….

>>21496729

>>21496729

>>21497010

>>21497028

>notablewith sauce

>yes I see the references at the bottom of the page, just no link.

there IS NO fucking link

it's a photo from a hardcopy book

if actual peer review journal references are not enuf

then YOU take responsibility for burying it