basically
Emeralds of Truth
ten million people don't send in or walk up to a government clerk's counter if they thought what they were doing is criminal. SOMEONE/S in "Government" have encouraged that to happen with assurance that 'it will be just fine'.
this "Government" needs to burn.
often wonder if it was intentional, or inadvertent, that Kubric made General Ripper the 'bad guy' who just happened to also call out fluoride???
i say that, because for all the enthusiastic support that film received from Boomer Peacenicks in the 60's and 70's…. ironically they ALSO associated Fluoride Criticism with a 'crazy ripper conspiracy theory'… and delayed the debate for four or five more decades (several generations of children MADE retarded by fucked up water).
did Kubrick just do that because at that time he honestly felt that fluoride was actually harmless… or did he do that because it was a manipulation to prevent people from finding a compelling argument against it? Juss Ask'n
please dear Lord… let little Zuck try to separate himself from Facebook.
fully agree
but several generations have been shullfucked in Government Skool to think backwards