ID: 8a6c21 Aug. 30, 2024, 6:07 p.m. No.21509997   🗄️.is đź”—kun

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/kamala-harris-pittsburgh-rally-schedule-donald-trump-campaign-20240830.html

 

Kamala Harris has a rally in Pittsburgh, while Donald Trump has a quiet Labor Day weekend campaign schedule

 

Also on Labor Day, second gentleman Doug Emhoff will head to Newport News, Va., and Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, will be in Milwaukee.

 

More details about the Pittsburgh visit had not been announced as of early Friday afternoon.

 

FIND THE LOCATION OF HER RALL, ANONS

How many people can she have at a rally without having already scheduled the place?

Is anyone on her volunteer list in PA to find out and get tickets?

ID: 8a6c21 Aug. 30, 2024, 7:10 p.m. No.21510325   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0452 >>0489 >>0683

Marchan doesn’t have the balls

 

>>21510194

Trump seeks to leverage immunity ruling in New York hush money case ahead of sentencingl

 

The former president’s lawyers are again attempting to move Trump’s state criminal case to federal court, after their prior bid was rejected last year.

 

Aug. 30, 2024, 12:21 PM CDT / Updated Aug. 30, 2024, 4:58 PM CDT

By Jordan Rubin

UPDATE (Aug. 30, 2024, 5:58 p.m. ET): On Friday, an entry on the federal court docket told Donald Trump’s lawyers that their filing attempting to move Trump’s state criminal case to federal court was deficient, noting that it did not include the opposing party’s consent or the court’s leave to file, which, the docket entry noted, the court had not granted.

 

Ahead of Donald Trump’s sentencing in his so-called hush money case, which is set for Sept. 18 in New York state court, the former president’s lawyers are attempting once again to move the criminal case to federal court. They lost a previous attempt to do so last year, but that was before the Supreme Court’s July 1 immunity ruling, which they’re now citing as a reason for the case to proceed in a federal forum.

 

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office “violated the Presidential immunity doctrine in grand jury proceedings, and again at trial, by relying on evidence of President Trump’s official acts during his first term in Office,” Trump’s lawyers wrote in their federal court filing Thursday. While they more vaguely raised the immunity issue in their failed removal attempt last year, they wrote in this latest filing that they “could not have anticipated the subsequent federal developments culminating in Trump v. United States,” referring to the Republican-appointed Supreme Court majority’s immunity ruling