New Langhan
https://x.com/RealChrisLangan/status/1830269161085251967
From my last post: "When I criticize international central banksters and their corporate flunkies and political/academic/media prostitutes, I'm careful not to conflate them with all Jews. It's an irony of this platform that when you refrain from such conflation, you get it from both sides…the ADL on one hand, and on the other, people who insist that every Jew is nestled deeply in the pocket of the top banksters."
https://pic.x.com/mdwwhkls8i
Responses:
(1) "What is the point of detaching criticism of an ethnic group from its actions or the actions of its most elite members? How is hatred of a thing different from hatred of its essential characteristics? It seems as farcical as saying opposing 'whiteness' is not opposition to Whites as a group."
(2) "Average conservatives claim to be against fatherlessness, criminality, and laziness, but claim to love America Blacks. These are the essential ethnic characteristics of that community. There is no effective way to be against the characteristics but not the thing in and of itself."
(3) "[Only] weirdo leftists [are] hellbent on separating zionism from jews when 95% of jews identify as zionist. Essentiaĺly we're talking about power, and nature abhors power vacuums."
(4) "If we consider ethnicities as superorganisms with extended phenotypes, [then] What matters is the effect the ethnicity has on the world. Even if only a small percent of the Jewish superorganism believes in Zionism and White replacement, they enable the people that do believe in them to achieve those goals. The superorganism itself is still at fault. For example, in ants, only some percent of the colony is engaged in some specialized activity, like foraging in your home for food. [But] you still destroy the entire colony as a means of combatting them."
Comment (in rebuttal of responses 1-4): "Criticising all Jews based on the actions of some elite members is prejudicial. Just as we don't assume guilt for all neighbours because one was caught stealing, it’s wrong to judge an entire group based on a few individuals' actions. Individual actions should not lead to collective blame. This seems to be what you're suggesting."
My response: This is true in principle, but there are conditions. Specifically, it's true for Jews who live their lives as free individuals unbeholden to tribal interests. For the rest, there is a serious problem involving collective identity and utility.
What you write is true only for those Jews who do not assert a definite collective identity and engage in aggressive identity politics on that basis. Jews - like Blacks - overwhelmingly assert a distinctive collective identity that contributes to their self-image, fuels their tribal loyalty, and (most importantly) causes them to (1) distinguish their group interests from those of other groups and (2) function as a coherent political bloc which routinely puts their special group interests over the nations in which they reside. Given their increasingly disproportionate wealth and power, this is a disastrous situation. As long as it persists, both Jews and Blacks invite judgment in terms of group traits, group tendencies, and group statistics. At the present time, an objective judgment on that basis would not necessarily be favorable to them.
It's really vary simple. Once you assert your own special collective level of identity and behave in accordance with its interests as opposed to everyone else's, you can and in fact must be judged in terms of it. You've chosen it as your identity, and that's the price. The only people who have a right to judgment exclusively as individuals are those who define themselves as individuals, and this right holds only to the extent that they are "assimilable by the national identity", i.e., those who for political purposes identify with the nation and its founding principles, reject countervening racial levels of identity, and refrain from divisive identity politics.
While this once described most Whites, some Jews and most Blacks play identity politics all the more effectively by denying non-Jewish Whites the same privilege, and are therefore not entitled to be judged purely as individuals while maintaining their pursuit of racial self-interest. Jews, Blacks, and others who put their own racial interests ahead of their nations of residence and the founding principles thereof are no friends of the nations in which they live, including the United States and those actually descended from its Founders. As long as they function as exceptional political blocs, they must be legally and politically contained.
1/2