Great job, baker!!
I won't recount my first non-bake.
(or 2nd or 3rd, kek)
but you did real gud.
backup baker on till 8/9ET
if needed, but berrrrry comfy lurking while new baker earns wings.
Pic of czech lb so BO doesn't have to do it again.
Hey TZ, it's clam.
I'd rather not, if you can do it.
But I'll take it if you can't.
Thanks for co-piloting newbaker to victory btw.
Nice.
>I recognized you
Funny how that works.
Major baker drama today, instinct was not to add "famefag" element to things tonight.
Sorry about the headache–#MeToo, kek.
But I'll take next bake if needed.
Or b4 if you need it.
Damn GA,
can't just leave it unattended.
When (((they))) try to demoralize you
and instead make your day
>Now it's picnic lady with the happy merchant?
Yes. Yes it is, kike.
And it will be fucking picnic lady ignoring happy merchant for many days to come, kek.
Here's my take baker, anon:
Good info here on other ways the swamp is being drained. These SEC creeps are as dirty as our other agencies. It isn't notable yet tho because it's just the beginning of a digg.
Main reason is that it doesn't link directly to something or someone Q has already sent us after. Examples of "somethings" are major resignations, deaths/suicides or arrests, or violent habbenings which could be cabal FFs. Examples of ppl are characters in Q crumbs and their spouses/families/business associates.
If Anon is financefag, then keep your eye on these things, and try to link it back to known Q topics/ppl. I sometimes find leads for diggs but can't trace all the way back to lead characters at first. Will post early findings here anyway in case another pair of eyes catches something, but not to be noted in itself.
I am (ex) pharmafag, so keep an eye there, and also have personal knowledge of pedo elite, so track both those things. Sometimes I connect to current Q topics, and it makes notables. Sometimes I don't, and I just keep digging.
Hope that helps.
Thanks for your efforts at bringing these sickos to justice, anons!!
It isn't the end of the world if it goes in, baker.
Actual govt news isn't as annoying to anons as unsauced opinions or too much news about buses crashing in 3rd world countries, kek.
I'm only adding on to my previous comment since I already weighed in, and since the issue of "what makes a notable" has gone hot lately. We do need to hash it out a little as a group.
To my mind, if the only connection to Strzok's wife is the fact that the SEC is her agency, I'm still not sure that's enough link. The complaint was against Wilbur Ross for insider trading. These guys do insider trading like they brush their teeth. As to why he got brought up on a charge, we have no way to know whether it has anything to do with Hodgman (wife). I googled both their names together (Ross and Hodgman) and didn't see any pics together looking chummy or collegial–even that would be enough connection to boost this to notable.
But again, no big deal noting it IMO.
>How does the JQ not tie into Qresearch?
I'm going to try answering this bc important.
Any of us that has been srsly red-pilled for long understands the centrality of the JQ. The sticking point here has to do with time/place and scale as relates to our current mission.
First: scale. I, for one, appreciates that JQ anon posts this good info here for normies, but yes, the volume of it does work against its message, just like a nag or screamer does. Not sure JQ anon is shill or just damn committed, but the result is the same unfortunately. If anon is earnest, pliz scale back. A lot.
Second: time. Q himself said “save Israel for last” but at the same time didn’t ignore the question entirely. If we are here to support Q, we should let that be our guidepost. Q’s current operation is bringing to light the crimes of our current/recent government officials based on their being government officials. This is the most obvious entre for the masses to the problem. If the root of the problem goes deeper, which we know it does, then we won’t stop there. It’s just not the time for that battle, IMO.
Think climbing a mountain. You work on the footing/terrain/oxygen levels at the state of the climb you currently are. You don’t say “but the top of the mountain really will have x/y/z problems.” Many anons are at different stages of their personal climbs, so their observing anons calling out shills with happy merchants etc., and the occasional exchange on their subversion, is good. We’re free speech researchers, and this is how we do it. Some of them may become JQ researchers too. It’s how we all got here.
Third: We really just need to keep the bread focused on Q-specific research, not all the ills of the past, or we lose focus. Whenever Q calls out some new slimeball, if his/her heritage can be shown to be Jewish (kek, “if”), I post it with sauce. I think that kind of exposure of normies to the JQ is in keeping with what Q knew he was getting coming here.