I smell fuckery afoot.
Engarde for the double/triple psyops from Team WvB JR.
Nice analysis.
>FYI: the GD cribbed rituals from all over the shop
Always important to remember.
> summoning the head of the dragon gives one the ability to utilise the power of the dragon
Great point. Also think new moon as the lunar equivalent of the winter solar solstice. A new beginning.
>The symbolism of POTUS in the Queen's backyard, at the font of masonry, on such an auspicious day will not be missed by the cabal.
Beginning to consider that the Queen had a conscious hand in setting the entire thing up. No way they met on Friday the 13th (a Templar Day) without her tacit blessing.
Could the Queen just have symbolically "handed over the reins" to DJT?
Good analysis from anon here on the royal guard mystery
>>2149874 (pb)
>>2150182
Precisely. If you recall, "quantum computing" was one of the 13 topics for this year's Bilderberg #66.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/google-doodle/10237347/Schrodingers-Cat-explained.html
Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed.
“[It] prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality,” Schrödinger wrote. “In itself, this would not embody anything unclear or contradictory.”
Schrödinger’s Cat has been used to illustrate the differences between emerging theories in quantum mechanics, by testing how they would approach the experiment.
For example, the ‘many worlds interpretation’, developed in the 1950s, would argue that when the box is opened, the observer and dead-and-alive cat split into two realities, in one of which the observer sees a dead cat and the other an alive one.
Well, we all always have a choice, but some choices are loaded with tremendous consequence.
Agree that this could be one of those times.
Don't think any American ever should, but again, choices.
There's also the whole matter of Liz waiting outside for 15 minutes while the butlers check their watches.
Well, you know CNN is gonna spin & deflect, cuz that's all they know how to do.
Wonder if Zucker and his handlers picked up on all the cues?
If I recall, The Queen's never granted an interview her entire life (maybe 1?). She "speaks" in symbolism.
Not too up to speed on her fashion choices, but remember her always dressing in 1 solid color. Yet yesterday, she wears a green dress under the blue coat.
You might very well be onto something anon. Curious what the Duke of Kent thinks about this turn of events.
Indeed. Was the first thing that came to mind so just threw it out there, spitball and all.
Since we're on the topic, wonder how the Google/NASA supercomputer is coming along?
https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2320910/nsa-is-designing-a-quantum-supercomputer
Google and NASA are believed to co-own a quantum computing machine already, but even this is not believed to be powerful enough to perform the type of decryption that the NSA hopes to achieve.
The theory behind quantum computing is ridiculously complicated, but boiled down the explanation is that unlike a conventional chip, in which data exists as a series of zeroes and ones, quantum computing allows data to exist simultaneously in multiple states, meaning that many unnecessary intermediate calculations can be ignored and making resolution of a given problem many orders of magnitude faster.
If you are beginning to think that this is all beginning to sound a little bit like a Hollywood movie, you're right. But if that analogy scares you, think of it more like Emile Borel's Infinite Monkeys Hypothesis. If you give an infinite number of Alan Turings an infinite number of Enigma machines…. µ
Every time i see this photo, my eye immediately goes first to that car with the brake lights on. Which leads the eye to the guy directly behind the car.
Never could figure out if it was relevant or just another distraction.
Right, like opium. Feel same, especially when thinking about all those Canadian "native" kids that went missing and where they might have gone.
Not sure if & how the public could handle the 100% Truth (if the Truth is near to how we see it atm).
Some of the possibilities are so revolting, they really need time to creep in & digest slowly, else be puked all over the floor.
>Could they be changing their tactics from attacks to a phony surrender to get 'into the tent'?
Definitely got keep our eye out for the ruse. The Brits are masters of the double/triple psyops.
>And if there are multiple possible outputs they come out superimposed.
Like layers on a photoshopped image, yes?
Intuition says it's a bit more "magical" than you are giving credit for, but don't possess the requisite technical knowledge to logically refute your points.
Would be interesting to hear a response to them from the stewards of Summit at the DOE.
Fascinating topic for certain.
https://www.energy.gov/articles/summit-supercomputer-ranked-fastest-computer-world
OK, i got it now, the large photo in
is from July 2014. Very nice catch.
Still a possibility that similar but different signs could have been placed in same location at a future date.
>But using stars in the sky in this photo, we should be able to tell not only time of year, but close in on the time of day as well.
We sure could. Would need to know first which part of sky that photo is showing.
Not too familiar with London, but here's a map.