>worth saving.
>Hamas is the Mossad
>How the fuck is it that there is not more and better video of the attack on the Pentagon?
>There are more cameras per sq/ft at the Pentagon than just about any place on Earth
EXACTLY
Did ya consider "inside job", inet wiped?
>are incredibly low res and grainy.
CGA VGA > sVGA > xVGA > >>>> 4K >>8K
Vid cameras back then prob VGA/sVGA
>proves without doubt projected airplanes
or there were ZERO planes? CGI?
watch vid again
>What anon said was that there was no plane.
soz, language is not anons forte, I misunderstood.
On same page…that makes 2 of us…only 349.9999m to go!
>Where was cruise missle fired from?
PENTAGON: (the towers were no hit by planes CGI after. watch TV helo vid to confirm)
Something anon has pondered for years.
a) ground launch = someone would have seen the vehicle ?
b) at what point does a SCUD arm itself? (SCUD was claimed in one review of the pentagon vid atm) Not sure if an anon can trace / track the SCUD to the possible weapon source?
c) If a ground launch from "out of town" then how far can a SCUD fly? remote controlled? Drops altitude…
d) at the time "flight paths" of planes were shown on TV. Was that the SCUD flight path?
e) can a SCUD be dropped from aircraft? what sort? flight logs? pilot?
Anon still has Q's.
c)
Remember how long ago this was tech wise.
No AI back then. CGI was re the "planes" & buildings.
HOWEVER anon was around at the time (was 3-4am here?) and watch it 'live' & saw that reporter doing the cross. OB broadcasting wasn't as good. Also the vid is MP4, which didn't exist back then. also 50fps vs 60fps used to mess with vid conversions. anon doesn't the vid is 'fake' but never know. But why create a "no wings no tail" CNN report? Same reason TV helo was told to "back off" filming the towers?
>tax accountants to structure around it anyway, but it’ll be everyday citizens left holding the bag.
HOWEVER, Capital Gains also works other way around. (here).
If asset goes UP in value then kameltoe says pay tax on unrealised gains.
if asset value goes DOWN then does that mean a tax DEDUCTION for the LOSS?
so crash the Real Estate market, write down the value of assets, wait by mailbox for gov chq ?
Is that the blackrock & co plan?
>polio vaccination
>auce your fuckin post!
Why? What does "sauce it" actually mean any how? It's a vid from the net, an OPINION just like anons.
I have a copy & can ID the org poster, BUT that will ID him. Then in 3 2 1…his twat account will be suspended.
Better the vid is anon, that way if (YOU) & a few(?) other share it (assuming you think there is something in it worth watching) it might go viral.
ANON works, just need to protect da sauces of research … IMHO
>why scud not cruise?
NFI, whats the differences? any ammo-anons around?
I said SCUD because thats the word that anon heard. No idea what one is other than goes bang & can cover up paperwork for hrc
in todyas tech world we anal-ise 'details'…
the BIGer pics is: why no investy? why FAST cleanup of steel & sent to chyna/
what about thegold? the paperwork in pentagon? it's the big piccy that does not 'fit' hence anon has concerns, esp due to what came after. in mid east
>christianity (read: Vatican)
mixing thing up there. the vatcan didn't start until 325AD after a meeting where ROMANS agreed to one religion with a ceasar hung on the wall or mary statue. catlick different group to christians & muslims 7 hindus & seven day avengests & …. etc etc
Try this to understand my point
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuCn8ux2gbs
EXACTLY
Protect ya sources is #1.
like I said his & other twat accounts get shutdown by orders from blackrock / dems / controllers.
Like I said if like vid then share it on YOUR accounts if thinks it's BS then don't share it.
But anon does not want to get guys account shuttered. this was the mistake 8chan made back in day, so many accounts of 'researchers' got closed 'because'
so if YOU share it then add YOUR url as "source".
>Flat Earth Morons
I didn't say or even link to ANYTHING flat earth.
The vid I linked to is a HISTORY of the world
F'n retard that comment on something after making assumptions …f'ck me