>Good time for anons to consider becoming proto members.
If I didn't know better, I'd almost think theSPAMwas coordinated in an effort to push anons to pay you.
Pull back the veil of 8Kun and discover the Reddit that lurks beneath
>haven't completed that faith
That's a weird way of talking about faith.
Faith is not an action that can be completed. Faith is a state of mind.
>Fatal
I'm still alive.
>error
Faith is not a state of mind?
Faith is the irrational belief in something without a proper reason, i.e. a state of mind.
Does faith only pertain to your Religion?
>The act of choosing to Trust
No… you don't 'do' faith. You have faith.
Faith is not an action.
>The act of choosing to Trust.
And even if I granted you this definition. Just for the sake of argument.
How does, completing the act of choosing to Trust turn into knowledge?
What constitutes completing that action. The act of choosing.
The act of choosing has nothing to do with knowledge, you can choose something you know nothing about about and you can make choices you didn't know you made.
To recap
>completed that faith
Is a completely meaningless phrase.
Have a good day.
>but when that faith is completed
See → >>21520723
Why are you phrasing it like that when all you mean to say was that you were 'vindicated in your faith'.
Did you fail to 'complete' the faith if you turned out to trust wrong?
Hope and faith are good equivalents.
You can have faith in/hope for things that are not true and/or will not become true.
Faith and knowledge are not in the same realms.
>it is a persistence which is an action
Is love an action?
And no, I don't mean the act of having sex… you pervert. kek
>If you "had" the faith of a mustard seed, you could move mountains.
>Contemplate that one
>it will take a few years at best.
You ain't lying.
Since mustard seeds don't have agency or consciousness they cannot by definition have 'faith'.
Second, moving mountains. You mean like up-rooting them? Pushing the tectonic plates? Or metaphorically like how Muhammed refused to go to the mountains so the mountains went to him? (I butchered that idiom).
So indeed, figuring out what ever you mean by that nonsense statement would take me years and I'm sure I still wouldn't get any closer.
>I leave that one for you to figure out
>No, it is a state of mind that requires action.
Yup.
Requiring an action and being an action is not the same thing.
But I thought (you, IP hopping I assume, said):
>persistence which is an action
and love is persistent, so why is it not an action?
>Love can have varying degrees depending on a host of factors. Persistence can be a small, steady, or large step, as long as it moves in a forward direction.
Now replace 'Love' with 'Faith' in that sentence and tell me how it doesn't fit.
>it is interchangeable because it is a truth.
Faith is not truth.
Neither is love.
Faith can lead you to untruths.
You can learn to love evil.
FYI
When I'm talking about God, I'm referring to the giant spaghetti monster.
>THE LIGHT.
You mean the THE LIGHT that has controlled the minds of you and your ancestors for generations.
To the point where rulers would put them to death for not swearing allegiance to said 'LIGHT'?
Such a bright light.
>or there were ZERO planes? CGI?
Projection is (can be depending on the tech) CGI
Like layering one image over another.
What anon said was that there was no plane.
>goes back millennia
New-age isn't very new.
>goes along way in explaining
Sure, if you want to explain it away without ever discovering the truth.
>All they had was time
Wrong. They were very busy, surviving.
>Remote viewing is a learnable skill
How come it has never produced any consistent results under trials better than chance or guessing?
>The results are repeatable
Wrong. You need some sauce to go along with that claim.
>these two sessions are highly respected and well known in the field
I don't care if other idiots respect them. That doesn't validate them at all. It's just an appeal to authority.
>///
I member when sigils were frowned upon by the jannies here.
I even remember æi using his <^sigil and sperging out like a child when told to stop.
<beep boop
Is that why their need for symbolism will be their down fall?
>I hope you understand,
I do.
You use their source of power to protect yourself from them.
Just like how Bilbo used the ring to protect himself from Sauron.
Did I get the analogy right?