abully at the store started being a jerk to me and told me I don't kjnow how to pronounce Kamala
so I looked it up and it's pronounced
"comma-lah"
I got triggered and told him he was a bully and a coward.
Now I have to deal with my anger and perhaps think of how I tell my priest (at confession) about my anger.
I was discussing stuff with a person who hates trump and trying to just listen and hear and absorb and said her name and someone who wasn't even talking to us said 'blah blah blah you should at least learn to pronounce her name' and I told him I didn't know how to pronounce it. and then he started in with other stuff, nothing about policies or issues, and I just couldn't let it slide. I should have just walked away. I didn't call him a bully, I said he was a coward and that she never got a single vote.
the weird thing is that there were two others who went on and on about how bad trump is in their eyes and I just listened. I have no problem hearing that kind of thing.
but when someone critized me for not pronouncing the name I thought 'what a jerk.'
and went over and gave him a verbal tonque lashing telling him that I didn't do it on purpose, I simply didn't know how to pronounce it.
but he wasn't wanting to clear up any arguments, but just cause conflict and I told him off. I had to walk away.
a confession is a private affair and the confessional ought not be mocked, in my opinion.
sorry I can't watch this through to the end.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2024/09/03/tiktok-users-exploiting-chase-bank-glitch-were-really-just-committing-check-fraud/
"TikTok Users Exploiting Chase Bank ‘Glitch’ Were Really Just Committing Check Fraud"
are people really this . . . not smart?
check fraud is not something that one can pass off as a programming error.
how could it be real?
video cameras aren't allowed in a confessional booth.
also what priest would consent to being filmed during a confession?
a priest who tells others what is confessed is subject to excommunication! It's a very very serious breach and not tolerated!
pretty much everyone who hasn't studied the issue, and isn't learned in astrophysics, or worked for say, the USAF or other Mil does not KNOw that the moon landings are fake and if you present them with evidence they have a hard time fathoming it.
it's not widely known, and it's still considered to be a 'conspiracy theory' no matter that one can not pass through the various radiation belts, or that one of the landings supposedly happened during a period of high solar flare activity.
the chart I saw was with a logrithmic scale for the radiation levels.
the teacher pointed out . . . when the missions were.
when asked point blank the teacher did not give an answer but basically indicated that we should 'think for ourselves. '
there was a radiation spike during one of the missions. The information on the radiation levels, as far as I recall, was not classified.
a broken clock?
you mean a dial faced clock.
a digital clock, if broken, will never be 'right' in a verifiable way.
nor will a stopped dial-faced clock.
the key is that the autocoorelation between the correct time and the shown time.
how far off is it?
you can't know.
but if you took a broken clock and used it as a sun dial you could then know the time. ironic isn't it?
if a clock is with the wrong time but still counting correctly (with an hour being an hour) it will never be 'right' but it will be useful for recording durations.
that whole 'broken clock' analogy is so flawed I aways get triggered to explain how flawed (but one could write a book on how flawed) when ever anyone uses it.
people should be smart enough to understand that everyone is a sinner.
people should be smart enough to not cast blame on everyone for the actions of a few.
It's well known that many Catholics aren't really all that holy, and don't really care about sin and don't answer to anyone but themselves.
that being said those aren't 'Good Catholics', if you get my drift.
are you ready to face the idea that what you say might be a kind of slander?
don't tell me, tell your Maker.