https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCbfTN-caFI&t=2496s
Anons thoughts on Q+ saying he could have locked her up, but didn't because he didn't want to because it would have looked bad?
Cheers for the only serious reply.
>The irony is that cleaning house and genuinely going after corruption would bring the country together long-term.
1000%
Dark to Light
The question was about power corrupting.
He didn't have to bring Hillary up at all, much less say he was just bullshitting us about locking her up.
I would have given him the benefit of the doubt forever if I didn't hear him say it himself.
>it would divide the country and no one would respect the office of the president anymore
They did this anyway.
>What did POTUS mean by this?
It certainly isn't good.
For contrast, imagine how awesome it would have been if he said:
"You can read a lot into people's reposts. Even moreso than their own words. Especially if you look into the accounts that they are reposting."
We'd be flipping shit
>you deserve to lose, you know as well as i do that he was emphasizing that every symbol is noted before he reposts something, so therefore, Q was reposted due to his association with Q
>youre on the losing team and cannot wait for flynn and his DoD minions to stand at their military tribunals and have Justice served
Is this what cognitive dissonance looks like?
>Potus: A
>You: This clearly proves POTUS means B