Repost

Did Hillary collude with the Russians to try to steal the election?

Think about how the dems always project. Blame the crimes they committed onto their opponents. Think muh Trump Collussion.

Think if Mueller is ourguy and he is indicting Russians.. then maybe they did interfere in the election. For Hillary.

Read pic related and think about how Trump keeps pointing this out. Obama did nothing. He was accomplice?

Q hasn't said anything about this as a theory. Nor anyone else. But what if?

Just doesn't make sense to me why Trump has to be blamed. Why isn't Hillary/Obama publically called out for ALL of their crimes?

We need disclosure on these matters. Govt needs to stop hiding the truth from us.

Who wants to organize for realsies?

Digging/meming/redpilling is fun.

But who wants to get up off of the couch and go do something about it?

Do anons know their true power?

How large are our actual numbers?

What kind of influence could we wield as a collective?

Discussions happening here: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2139557.html

>>2153729

>Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?

POTUS DECLASS NOW! We want Truth.

>What happens to the FBI?

>Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged.

GOOD. Every prev case controlled by BAD actors. Every prev case CORRUPT. Burn It Down.

>60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity.

>These people should be hanging.

FULL DISCLOSURE. HANG THEM. NO 60% PRIVATE.

>>2153429

>>>2152475 Is Q predicting RR's statement, or is RR copying Q?

>Read the notable above if you read no others

This Notable is misleading af.

>>2153557

DO IT Q

No more pussy-footing.

Gloves Off.

Swift Action Time.

Take No Prisoners.

>>2153709

Notable.

>>2153644

Notable.

>>2153871

Keep an eye out for new Corsis fame fagging on here (((Wictor))) +

>>2153909

I too think Jones does more good than harm.

But do look into Gate Keepers.

Noam Chomskey is the same.

Good source for vast redpill knowledge.

But conveniently steers followers away from Federal Reserve.

What does AJ steer us away from?

>>2153777

A Higher Loyalty

or some BS

>>2153935

kek

>>2153989

>Woops, yournewswire is not considered a credible source.

Agreed. But anons don't take any source as "credible". And any source may have some truth in it. That's why we dig.