>>21534702, >>21534935 pbs

DJT: Nobody can believe I am still under a Gag Order from Judge Merchan

In addition to >>21534935 legal remedy pertaining to gag orders. The 4th and 6th Amendment is as follows:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

So free speech is an effect of personal security to defend oneself and the 4th amendment gives you the right from unreasonable seizures of that effect because language

The 6th Amendment:

Sixth Amendment

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

So free speech to defend oneself is obtaining a witness in ones favor, even if it is oneself.

>>21537595

Notable

>>21537595

I would advise you President Trump, to not only use these remedies but also to not wait for the last minute before they sentence you. To fall into their hands even for a small moment just to make a point, is utter foolishness. They will take every path possible to kill you and as we can see, protective services can be compromised or lack integrities that open opportunities for malice.

These people are cunning, and all it takes in a hospital is one nurse with a needle, a toxin, or a scissor clamp and it is over. Then to rely on authorities or judges in hopes of them not being compromised is futile at best. All an effort needs is a compromised undertaker or autopsy to hide the truth in this day and age. These saboteurs could easily use venting systems or taint food that cameras just won't catch. This is not a game, many of these people are cowardly murderers.

>>21537595

When can a Federal court take over a case?

Federal question jurisdiction: The case involves a federal law or the Constitution, and the federal court has the authority to decide the issue. This includes claims based on federal statutes, regulations, or treaties.

Diversity jurisdiction:

The case involves citizens of different states, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 (as specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1332). This allows the federal court to hear the case to avoid conflicts between state courts and to ensure uniform application of federal law.

Pendent jurisdiction:

The case involves both federal and state law claims, and the federal court has jurisdiction over the federal claims. In these cases, the federal court may exercise pendent jurisdiction over the state claims, allowing it to hear and decide both types of claims.

Appeals from state courts:

The Supreme Court may take appeals from state supreme courts when state law raises an important issue of federal law to be decided. This can occur in cases involving constitutional issues, such as claims of “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment.

Removal:

A defendant can remove a case from state court to federal court by filing a notice of removal in federal court and notifying the state court and other parties. This is typically done when the defendant believes the federal court has jurisdiction over the case.

These factors demonstrate the circumstances under which a federal court may take a case from a state court, ensuring that federal courts address issues involving federal law, conflicts between states, and other matters that require uniform application of federal law.

President Trump was denied his 6th Amendment right to call witnesses in his favor, including himself as a witness using his Constitution right to non-abridged free speech guaranteed in the 1st Amendment. Therefor, the Federal courts has to take this case from Judge Merchan and the State due to these violation of Constitutional rights.

>>21537806

Notable