Anonymous ID: 04dd1b July 14, 2018, 10:36 a.m. No.2154295   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2154020

It was shown already that the AF1 photo wasn't fake. Cannot find the bread though.

 

>>2154279

You alone never got a satisfying answer. Yet, it was shown countless of times already. Unfortunately, I do not know in which bread it was. Also, on which criteria did you base your test of authenticity on?

Anonymous ID: 04dd1b July 14, 2018, 10:40 a.m. No.2154321   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2154020

Before I forget it, retard. I would like to know exactly your reasoning and proof that shows that Q's AF1 picture is fake. If you cannot provide any of this except for bullshit arguments, then your words mean nothing here.

 

We are not Q-turds, if the evidence provided by him is as clear as day. As you are the one who is making an allegation, it's YOUR duty to show the proof that makes your allegation legit. Otherwise all of your statements are just bs.

Anonymous ID: 04dd1b July 14, 2018, 11:09 a.m. No.2154566   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4636 >>4660 >>4842

>>2154554

You seriously have no clue, do you?

 

Let's assume the government would have to reveal everything? Do you even know what this could mean for operations that could save lifes? Well, as soon as these operations go public, they can be easily interrupted by foreign policies and thus risking a lot of lives.

Anonymous ID: 04dd1b July 14, 2018, 11:31 a.m. No.2154766   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4885

>>2154660

Are you seriously that dull? What would have happened if Trump's operation on North Korea went public before the public negotiation talks even started? I guarantee you 100%, it would have failed because Obama and Co. or other foreign governments would have done everything to not let Trump succeed.

 

So, I have nothing else to say: Holy shit. You are really retarded. There is no help to you.

Anonymous ID: 04dd1b July 14, 2018, 11:40 a.m. No.2154845   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2154813

Your statement is inherently contradictory. Besides that, his question was not cryptical at all. You saying that he is not Q is true, but is irrelevant, because his question does not imply that he tries to pretend or act like Q. If that would be the case (thinking logically) then any question asked by any anon could be considered "cryptic" because Q would be the only one allowed to do it.

 

Thus, your statement and syllogism does not make sense. Try next time.