>>2153533 lb
Took a 700 level course in turbulent flow. Discussed this in depth that there were projects trying to do this exact thing. None of them panned out due to the complexity of it all. Our current weather prediction super computers use 50-70k equations solved simultaneously in able to predict the weather and accuracy still doesn't go past 5 days due to uncertainty, lack of data points, and the propagation of errors.
The theory is though that there are critical points that can be acted upon where the least amount of input has the most drastic change in output. These can be mathematically proven in theory when you are looking at a simplified system but scaling up to actual earth weather has proven to be impossible. We had to do a thought experiment homework problem showing that if there were sensors surrounding the earth in a 1 foot by 1 foot cubic grid from the ground to space that uncertainty and propagation of errors would not allow accurate predictions anything past something like a week if I remember correctly. For human controlled climate, you'd need to know when and where these critical points occur and then be able to apply force or energy in the correct way to get the specific outcome you want. We still have trouble intercepting missiles and that is child's play compared to this shit.