Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 10:51 a.m. No.2154400   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4427 >>4430 >>4498 >>4628

(couldn't let this one go)

>>2154218 (lb)

>Yeah. There is no trusting a government that keeps 60% from the public. Never.

So you think it's better to reveal ALL, classified info, foreign policy plans, black ops to take out evilfuck A or sickfuck C, etc etc, 100%, so that YOU can be satisfied, even though people would literally die when such intelligence is revealed re: covert operations?

I'm not saying trust muh government 100%, I'd never tell you to do that. I'm asking if your selfishness is this serious? ESPECIALLY, when you can dig up some of that 60% black ops yourself?

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 10:57 a.m. No.2154452   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4573 >>4619

>>2154284

>They are preparing for this by activating progressive activists.

>RED LINE.

>Once the documents are supplied and viewed by Senate and Congressional leaders (& the public), they LOSE.

>MSM will portray progressive activists as a large part of the pop โ€“ this is FALSE.

>No possibility of compromise.

>Do not underestimate our resolve.

>We stand at the ready.

Worst case scenario = 2 words: National Guard.

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 11:03 a.m. No.2154507   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4533 >>4609

>>2154427

>Timing is everything

>The end won't be for everyone.

>That choice, to know, will be yours.

80% disclosure, how long do you think that it would take from point A of releasing said info, to point B of public interest? OR, shouldn't public interest be generated first? That's our job. The public can't ask for what they don't know exists, and it's an imposition on free will just to dump it all on the masses & disrupt their lives, IF, they even believe what's released.

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 11:10 a.m. No.2154576   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4653

>>2154498

I even if i don't fully agree, I can understand everything you said up to these points:

>Tired of faggots calling for more secrecy for BAD actors because said faggots are still brainwashed into thinking said BAD actors are on their side.

Who said bad actors shit shouldn't be revealed? Question is, is the public ready to ACCEPT what's revealed, or no? Is the stage set for that? Or will it be disputed as more lies from muh government?

>Military Industrial Intelligency Agency is our friend faggots. Give up everything to them!

They already have the info, and the manpower, and the technology, there's nothing to give them (except funding and support, if that's what you mean. It's the other way around, they should be providing that info to us, & I think Q is just the beginning of that. We WILL have disclosure eventually, but at what cost while the bad actors that you mentioned are still out there & can use it to there benefit, before the public benefits from it in any way. Get the bad actors out of the way, then tell people what the hell they've been doing. If I'm not mistaken, that's the plan.

the 40/60, is for NOW, not forever. More to come as progress is made, and the public WANTS to know what the hell has been happening. Until then it's just useless info for them. Overall, close to 100% transparency is virtually impossible unless we somehow get a utopia out of this. Which i doubt will happen.

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 11:14 a.m. No.2154622   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4684

>>2154533

>MUH appeasement faggotry. "don't do the 1 thing that will defeat our enemy now that we have them cornered" "the people can't handle it!" "play nice" "forget about demanding disclosure and go back to ur comfy bread FOREVER"

You're mistaking me for anons who you may have come across before. i never said any of that, keep you presumptions and ask me how I see it. Again, 40/60 is fine for now while we are in a silent war. As progress is made, 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, etc. That's what I see happening. 100/0, impossible, again, unless we somehow make a utopia out of the world and there's no need for investigations, recon missions, spying on hostiles, etc.

 

What makes you so sure that the public would give a fuck it ALL data re: bad actors was released, say, tomorrow?

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 11:27 a.m. No.2154739   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4764 >>4788 >>4809 >>4875

>>2154554

Ok, so when the people who transport our food, gas, keep our water clean, keep law & order, teach our children, can't make it to work for weeks on end because they are fucked up mentally and/or rioting, then what? Preppers may be prepared for that, but the general public, nope. BE REALISTIC, not everyone wants to see this country fall to shit, even if temporarily.

>>2154609

Secrecy MUST end, I agree, it must be done in steps and stages though, or, crash civilization and be forced to rebuild, rather than making it all a relatively smooth transition from darkness to light (observe the sunrise, it doesn't just "pop up" on the scene, it's a gradual change from dark to light). Shock value is what anons seem to be going for with the dawn to high noon in 3 seconds disclosure.

tl;dr

REVEALING THE TRUTH CAN"T HAPPEN OVERNIGHT. Period.

>>2154628

That's the common sense that I'm talking about, did i type it all out,? no, thanks for spelling it out though. Dark to light takes time, that's the point that I'm making overall, can't go from dawn to noon in seconds. That' doesn't mean that it will never be noon, It just won't be rushed simply because some anons have no patience.

>>2154653

>>2154684

>Public will never by "ready".

That I can understand. Mass shock = mass cleanup after. And by no means did i ever say or imply that MSM has anything to do with it. Fuck MSM. been on the slandered side of fake news myself.

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 11:42 a.m. No.2154857   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4945

>>2154764

>POTUS is 100% insulated - any discussion suggesting heโ€™s even a target is false.

 

While I appreciate your sense of urgency, I'd expect that there's contingency plans on the white hat side just as there are on the black hat side. Deep state lost control, and I can't see why anons are still giving them so much credit. They are lame ducks. To be totally honest, I'd rather that something actually be DONE to end their "appearance" of power (which is obviously still fooling some) than just to hear about what they've been doing, are doing & have planned. Take em out, then tell us why & how things will go moving forward, while revealing all of their past deeds so that it never happened again w/o the people being aware.

>>2154788

Yeah, attempted, and failed. Again, stop giving evil so much credit, that's where it draws it's power. At least TRY to imagine that regardless to thousands of years of history, that the tables can be and are being turned in favor of the good.

>>2154809

Do you have children? Can you teach them algebra while they're still in diapers? No, you teach them according to what they are prepared to not only accept, but UNDERSTAND, and you set the stage for that prior to with the basics. Or else, it goes in one ear, out the other, until they are prepared by prior lessons to learn the more complex. Have YOU told everyone you know about satanic child sacrifices of the cabal? And how did that work out if you did so w/o prerequisites?

Anonymous ID: 2b1858 July 14, 2018, 11:53 a.m. No.2154929   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4941

>>2154875

Nice presumption. I don't "believe" in personal freedom, accountability, or cliches for that matter. I KNOW that 100% "shock and awe" theatrical, laying it all out before the people at once, is not a logical, reasonable way to go if you're looking for the BEST results. note that I've never said that we should disclose all possible, it's a matter of HOW it's done. USe your own environment as an example, is everyone around you going to accept ALL of the truth that yo ave available for them today, w/o fail & w/o rejection, and being able to go out and function fully the next day to keep society running? Be honest. then, take that microcosm & expand it to 320,000,000+ people. Then expand it worldwide, and tell me again that 100% disclosure all at once is a good idea and will work just fine with no problems. Account for the problems that would be caused by such, since you brought up accountability. And, the interference with personal freedom of those that simply do not want to know.