Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 10:33 a.m. No.2154279   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4295 >>4383

>>2154020

>I see Q/ pamphlet/ brainstorm and others, haven't come up with a explanation for the fake AF1 photo, that is going to be a tricky one to explain isn't it.

Wasn't able to determine authenticty of AF1 photo + POTUS face photo.

But there were a couple other posts before that which were concerning.

One about "BilBerberg". Another of an altered BO speech.

Never got a satisfying answer to any of those.

Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 10:51 a.m. No.2154402   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2154374

>>2154341

>>2154340

>>2154333

It's obvious to anyone who uses duckduckgo that the search results are inferior to other search engines. Pretty bad that their web crawlers haven't updated search term for FLOTUS after this long. Don't necessarily think it means their comped tho. I used the duck for privacy, acknowledging inferior search results

Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 11:02 a.m. No.2154498   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4524 >>4560 >>4576 >>4621 >>4655

>>2154427

>>2154400

>>2154430

>>2154469

>So you think it's better to reveal ALL, classified info, foreign policy plans, black ops to take out evilfuck A or sickfuck C, etc etc, 100%, so that YOU can be satisfied, even though people would literally die when such intelligence is revealed re: covert operations?

This has always been a conundrum, but anons concerns about 100% disclosure are valid.

 

The intelligence agencies, secret ops, etc aren't in our best interests to begin with, not least of which b/c they can (and are) used against US (their #1 threat to maintaining control).

 

Also, seem to remember something about the founding fathers not even wanting a standing army.

 

How necessary are these secrets? What benefit vs. cost do they give US?

 

CIA et al SHOULD BE DISBANDED.

Military/Industrial complex has usurped our Republic.

 

If there were a Constiutional Amendement banning all classified info I would be happy.

Just look at how they hide behind it to hide their crimes.

That IS it's primary purpose.

 

Tired of faggots calling for more secrecy for BAD actors because said faggots are still brainwashed into thinking said BAD actors are on their side. It's a mental illness. Similar to how libs feel powerful by siding with corporate oligarchs who virtue signal but simultaneously call for removing our Bill of Rights. We have those types on our side too. Military Industrial Intelligency Agency is our friend faggots. Give up everything to them!

Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 11:06 a.m. No.2154533   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4622

>>2154507

>shouldn't public interest be generated first

Public interest will be generated UPON the RELEASE of said info.

>it's an imposition on free will just to dump it all on the masses & disrupt their lives, IF, they even believe what's released.

MUH appeasement faggotry. "don't do the 1 thing that will defeat our enemy now that we have them cornered" "the people can't handle it!" "play nice" "forget about demanding disclosure and go back to ur comfy bread FOREVER"

Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 11:31 a.m. No.2154764   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4788 >>4809 >>4857

>>2154739

>REVEALING THE TRUTH CAN"T HAPPEN OVERNIGHT. Period.

Keep in mind we have time limits. Anything can happen before truth is revealed in your comfy timeline. We risk losing a once in millennia opportunity. What if Congress/Trump assassinated? What happens if lose in midterms? We have the opportunity now, take it.

Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 11:37 a.m. No.2154809   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4857

>>2154788

>>2154764

>>2154739

AND BTW to all the appeasement concernfagging "the people can't handle it" "wait until they're ready"

In what way shape and form have the people come closer to accepting satanic child sacrifice after 1.5 yrs of POTUS presidency? At this rate will they EVER be ready? Does it matter if they are ready?

No.

Release it.

Anonymous ID: d64819 July 14, 2018, 11:56 a.m. No.2154945   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4967

>>2154857

I see your points, but we simply disagree.

 

>I'd expect that there's contingency plans

Nothing is certain, nothing is foolproof.

 

>Yeah, attempted, and failed.

Are there any lengths the Cabal won't go to to try to stop this?

 

>you teach them according to what they are prepared to not only accept

Fine if they don't accept right away, release now, teach later.

 

We will continue to disagree anon. This is not an argument that can be won or lost. You have your preference, I have mine. Thanks for the chat tho