>>21553338

Where is the actual source for that claim?

That site links to https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/coronavirus-covid-19-cber-regulated-biologics/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

but that site says:

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula)is authorized for use as follows:

Individuals 6 months through 4 years of age:

Unvaccinated individuals: Three doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula) are administered. The first two doses are administered three weeks apart. The third dose is administered at least 8 weeks after the second dose.

It also says 6 months old, not 9 months old.

>>21553362

Same for Moderna, which is linked right afterwards.

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/coronavirus-covid-19-cber-regulated-biologics/moderna-covid-19-vaccine

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula) is authorized for use as follows:

Individuals 6 months through 4 years of age:

Unvaccinated individuals: Two doses of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula) are administered. The second dose is administered 1 month after the first.

>>21553401

You want to defend an alternative news article that is claiming obvious incorrect things, and the poster did not even do the most basic checking, by using "muh morally correct"?

>You are part of the problem

lmao, I'm against fake news, which everyone on here should be. Fake News includes alternative Fake News.

If you can't even be bothered to do basic checking, you shouldn't be here.

>>21553395

>https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1832849150292988212

cap

>>21553501

>:(

Any idea when this has been posted?

All videos posted on here are archived, nothing is lost.

date range?

>>21553541

>last six or eight months.

can't near it down any more?

that's a lot of videos to look through.

was it notable'd?

>>21553501

>:(

>>21553364

Found one dancing video with Trump, changing outfits and a car at the beginning, and I also have never seen it before.

>>21553825

>CDC Pushes for Babies to Get 3 Unlicensed Covid mRNA Shots by 9 Months

Baker, check the links provided in the original article. They do not say what the article claims. This is not notable at all.

It's also 6 months, not 9 months.

>>21553841

Yikes, mine is better kek

That video causes serious uncanny valley.

>>21553892

>CDC Pushes for Babies to Get 3 Unlicensed Covid mRNA Shots by 9 Months

You are spreading obvious nonsense.

Check the fucking links.

Both links to fda that were provided don't say what the article claims.

Also it's 6 months, not 9 months.

It's entirely inaccurate and easily proven wrong by basic checking (opening up the links and reading)

>>21553892

>>21553899

If you want to keep that alternative fake news, at least remove my posts from that bullshit. I don't want to be connected to obvious fake news. Just pretend that the article says the truth, which you already are.